PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KRP vs. VLO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

KRP vs. VLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP (KRP) and Valero Energy Corporation (VLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KRP achieves a 32.35% return, which is significantly lower than VLO's 46.74% return.


KRP

1D
-0.20%
1M
-2.31%
YTD
32.35%
6M
37.01%
1Y
12.59%
3Y*
11.24%
5Y*
14.83%
10Y*

VLO

1D
-1.45%
1M
-6.44%
YTD
46.74%
6M
46.81%
1Y
73.82%
3Y*
31.15%
5Y*
29.68%
10Y*
20.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KRP vs. VLO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KRP
Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP
32.35%-18.60%20.43%0.76%36.93%89.97%-48.94%38.62%-8.93%-5.43%
VLO
Valero Energy Corporation
46.74%36.97%-2.96%5.86%74.95%40.25%-35.69%30.27%-15.73%44.80%

Correlation

The correlation between KRP and VLO is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2017

0.40

Fundamentals

Market Cap

KRP:

$1.76B

VLO:

$70.42B

EPS

KRP:

$0.60

VLO:

$13.77

PE Ratio

KRP:

24.59

VLO:

17.16

PEG Ratio

KRP:

0.09

VLO:

0.06

PS Ratio

KRP:

5.71

VLO:

0.57

PB Ratio

KRP:

3.37

VLO:

2.61

Total Revenue (TTM)

KRP:

$309.11M

VLO:

$126.17B

Gross Profit (TTM)

KRP:

$319.28M

VLO:

$12.45B

EBITDA (TTM)

KRP:

$177.16M

VLO:

$9.02B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KRP vs. VLO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KRP
KRP Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
KRP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KRP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
KRP Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
KRP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
KRP Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

VLO
VLO Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
VLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
VLO Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
VLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
VLO Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KRP vs. VLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP (KRP) and Valero Energy Corporation (VLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KRPVLODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.34

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.62

5.23

-4.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.58

12.85

-11.27

KRP vs. VLO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KRP Sharpe Ratio is 0.55, which is lower than the VLO Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KRP and VLO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KRP vs. VLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KRP drawdown since its inception was -80.91%, smaller than the maximum VLO drawdown of -87.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KRP and VLO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KRPVLODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.91%

-87.50%

+6.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.50%

-14.19%

-6.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.58%

-41.22%

+13.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.58%

-41.22%

+13.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-71.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.95%

-9.62%

+4.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.37%

-34.24%

+14.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.97%

5.76%

+2.21%

Volatility

KRP vs. VLO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP (KRP) is 6.60%, while Valero Energy Corporation (VLO) has a volatility of 10.17%. This indicates that KRP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KRPVLODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.60%

10.17%

-3.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.81%

27.59%

-10.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.01%

35.09%

-12.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.34%

36.94%

-8.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.29%

40.39%

+0.90%

Dividends

KRP vs. VLO - Dividend Comparison

KRP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.22%, more than VLO's 1.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KRP
Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP
10.22%13.61%10.78%11.50%11.26%8.36%11.00%9.29%12.22%5.17%0.00%0.00%
VLO
Valero Energy Corporation
1.97%2.78%3.49%3.14%3.09%5.22%6.93%3.84%4.27%2.34%3.51%2.40%

Financials

KRP vs. VLO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP and Valero Energy Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B50.00B20222023202420252026
65.54M
32.38B
(KRP) Total Revenue
(VLO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

KRP vs. VLO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP and Valero Energy Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
91.0%
19.1%
Portfolio components
KRP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP reported a gross profit of 59.66M and revenue of 65.54M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 91.0%.

VLO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Valero Energy Corporation reported a gross profit of 6.20B and revenue of 32.38B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.1%.

KRP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP reported an operating income of 15.80M and revenue of 65.54M, resulting in an operating margin of 24.1%.

VLO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Valero Energy Corporation reported an operating income of 1.73B and revenue of 32.38B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.4%.

KRP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP reported a net income of 3.97M and revenue of 65.54M, resulting in a net margin of 6.1%.

VLO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Valero Energy Corporation reported a net income of 1.26B and revenue of 32.38B, resulting in a net margin of 3.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


KRP and VLO have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VLO has higher volatility (10.17%) compared to KRP (6.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KRP dropped -80.91% vs VLO's -87.50%.

VLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KRP and VLO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer