PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KRP vs. ECH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KRP vs. ECH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP (KRP) and iShares MSCI Chile ETF (ECH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KRP achieves a 32.35% return, which is significantly higher than ECH's 2.23% return.


KRP

1D
-0.20%
1M
-2.31%
YTD
32.35%
6M
37.01%
1Y
12.59%
3Y*
11.24%
5Y*
14.83%
10Y*

ECH

1D
-0.85%
1M
1.75%
YTD
2.23%
6M
5.27%
1Y
36.61%
3Y*
14.33%
5Y*
12.22%
10Y*
4.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KRP vs. ECH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KRP
Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP
32.35%-18.60%20.43%0.76%36.93%89.97%-48.94%38.62%-8.93%-5.43%
ECH
iShares MSCI Chile ETF
2.23%65.41%-8.67%9.01%25.12%-19.80%-7.13%-17.79%-18.98%34.02%

Correlation

The correlation between KRP and ECH is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2017

0.20

The correlation between KRP and ECH shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.20 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KRP vs. ECH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KRP
KRP Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
KRP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KRP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
KRP Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
KRP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
KRP Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

ECH
ECH Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
ECH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ECH Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
ECH Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
ECH Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
ECH Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KRP vs. ECH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP (KRP) and iShares MSCI Chile ETF (ECH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KRPECHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.25

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.62

1.86

-1.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.58

4.41

-2.82

KRP vs. ECH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KRP Sharpe Ratio is 0.55, which is lower than the ECH Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KRP and ECH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KRP vs. ECH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KRP drawdown since its inception was -80.91%, which is greater than ECH's maximum drawdown of -74.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KRP and ECH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KRPECHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.91%

-74.08%

-6.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.50%

-19.74%

-0.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.58%

-25.59%

-1.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.58%

-25.59%

-1.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.95%

-24.03%

+19.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.37%

-37.48%

+18.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.97%

8.33%

-0.36%

Volatility

KRP vs. ECH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP (KRP) is 6.60%, while iShares MSCI Chile ETF (ECH) has a volatility of 9.09%. This indicates that KRP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ECH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KRPECHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.60%

9.09%

-2.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.81%

21.20%

-4.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.01%

25.51%

-2.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.34%

27.63%

+0.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.29%

27.27%

+14.02%

Dividends

KRP vs. ECH - Dividend Comparison

KRP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.22%, more than ECH's 1.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ECH
iShares MSCI Chile ETF
1.93%2.01%3.12%4.77%6.73%5.49%2.16%2.47%2.37%1.42%1.85%2.13%
KRP
Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP
10.22%13.61%10.78%11.50%11.26%8.36%11.00%9.29%12.22%5.17%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


KRP and ECH have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ECH has higher volatility (9.09%) compared to KRP (6.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KRP dropped -80.91% vs ECH's -74.08%.

ECH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KRP and ECH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer