KROP vs. XYLD
KROP (Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF) and XYLD (Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KROP is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Solactive AgTech & Food Innovation Index, while XYLD is a Derivative Income fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, KROP returned 0.81%/yr vs 11.27%/yr for XYLD. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KROP charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for XYLD.
Performance
KROP vs. XYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KROP achieves a 16.34% return, which is significantly higher than XYLD's 4.96% return.
KROP
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -0.06%
- YTD
- 16.34%
- 6M
- 14.63%
- 1Y
- 13.67%
- 3Y*
- 0.81%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XYLD
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 2.00%
- YTD
- 4.96%
- 6M
- 6.48%
- 1Y
- 17.66%
- 3Y*
- 11.27%
- 5Y*
- 7.72%
- 10Y*
- 8.25%
KROP vs. XYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KROP Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF | 16.34% | 7.95% | -8.74% | -23.86% | -27.23% | -18.75% |
XYLD Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF | 4.96% | 8.02% | 19.49% | 11.10% | -12.05% | 7.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between KROP and XYLD is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2021 | 0.45 |
The correlation between KROP and XYLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (1 year) to 0.45 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
KROP vs. XYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
KROP
XYLD
Industrials
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
KROP
XYLD
Basic Materials
KROP
XYLD
Consumer Defensive
KROP
XYLD
Healthcare
KROP
XYLD
Consumer Cyclical
KROP
XYLD
Communication Services
KROP
-
XYLD
Energy
KROP
-
XYLD
Financial Services
KROP
-
XYLD
Real Estate
KROP
-
XYLD
Technology
KROP
-
XYLD
Utilities
KROP
-
XYLD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KROP vs. XYLD — Risk / Return Rank
KROP
XYLD
KROP vs. XYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KROP | XYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.64 | -0.48 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.22 | 3.35 | -2.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.75 | 17.84 | -15.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KROP | XYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 | 2.71 | -1.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.69 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.57 | 0.60 | -1.17 |
Drawdowns
KROP vs. XYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KROP drawdown since its inception was -61.96%, which is greater than XYLD's maximum drawdown of -33.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KROP and XYLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KROP | XYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.96% | -33.46% | -28.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.29% | -5.29% | -6.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.70% | -15.53% | -13.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.05% | -0.15% | -48.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.50% | -3.72% | -40.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.99% | 0.99% | +4.00% |
Volatility
KROP vs. XYLD - Volatility Comparison
Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP) has a higher volatility of 4.77% compared to Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) at 0.88%. This indicates that KROP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KROP | XYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.77% | 0.88% | +3.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.01% | 5.37% | +6.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.04% | 6.55% | +9.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.28% | 11.22% | +11.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.28% | 14.21% | +8.07% |
KROP vs. XYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
KROP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than XYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
KROP vs. XYLD - Dividend Comparison
KROP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.35%, less than XYLD's 10.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KROP Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF | 2.35% | 2.73% | 1.89% | 1.36% | 0.71% | 0.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XYLD Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF | 10.52% | 10.51% | 11.54% | 10.51% | 13.43% | 9.07% | 7.93% | 5.76% | 7.12% | 5.18% | 3.23% | 4.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KROP and XYLD have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KROP has higher volatility (4.77%) compared to XYLD (0.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KROP dropped -61.96% vs XYLD's -33.46%.
On 3-year performance, XYLD leads with 11.27% vs 0.81% for KROP. On fees, KROP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, XYLD has been the lower-risk option at 0.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, XYLD has performed better with a 11.27% return vs 0.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
KROP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for XYLD.
XYLD has the higher dividend yield at 10.52%, compared with 2.35% for KROP.
KROP is categorized as Technology Equities, while XYLD is Derivative Income. KROP tracks Solactive AgTech & Food Innovation Index, while XYLD tracks Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for KROP and 0.60% for XYLD.
XYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KROP and XYLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer