KROP vs. ILS

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

KROP (Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF) and ILS (Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KROP is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Solactive AgTech & Food Innovation Index, while ILS is a Nontraditional Bonds fund actively managed by Brookmont. KROP is passively managed, while ILS is actively managed. Over the past year, KROP returned 7.63% vs 7.81% for ILS. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. KROP charges 0.50%/yr vs 1.58%/yr for ILS.

Performance

KROP vs. ILS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP) and Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF (ILS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KROP achieves a 11.60% return, which is significantly higher than ILS's 2.27% return.

KROP

• 1D: -1.01%
• 1M: -1.85%
• YTD: 11.60%
• 6M: 11.45%
• 1Y: 7.63%
• 3Y*: -1.05%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ILS

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 1.26%
• YTD: 2.27%
• 6M: 2.63%
• 1Y: 7.81%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KROP vs. ILS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
KROP Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF	11.60%	4.39%
ILS Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF	2.27%	3.54%

Correlation

The correlation between KROP and ILS is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2025	-0.05

Return for Risk

KROP vs. ILS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KROP

KROP Risk / Return Rank: 16
KROP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
KROP Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
KROP Omega Ratio Rank: 15
KROP Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
KROP Martin Ratio Rank: 16

ILS

ILS Risk / Return Rank: 96
ILS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
ILS Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
ILS Omega Ratio Rank: 95
ILS Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
ILS Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KROP vs. ILS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP) and Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF (ILS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KROP	ILS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.47	3.06	-2.58
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.79	5.05	-4.26
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.69	-0.59
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.68	14.18	-13.50
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.46	52.13	-50.67

KROP vs. ILS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KROP Sharpe Ratio is 0.47, which is lower than the ILS Sharpe Ratio of 3.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KROP and ILS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

KROP vs. ILS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KROP drawdown since its inception was -62.08%, which is greater than ILS's maximum drawdown of -2.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KROP and ILS.

Drawdown Indicators

	KROP	ILS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.08%	-2.46%	-59.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.29%	-0.55%	-10.74%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.70%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-51.27%	0.00%	-51.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-44.71%	-0.54%	-44.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.23%	0.15%	+5.08%

Volatility

KROP vs. ILS - Volatility Comparison

Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP) has a higher volatility of 4.54% compared to Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF (ILS) at 0.84%. This indicates that KROP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ILS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KROP	ILS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.54%	0.84%	+3.70%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.48%	1.68%	+10.80%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.19%	2.58%	+13.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.23%	3.77%	+18.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.23%	3.77%	+18.46%

KROP vs. ILS - Expense Ratio Comparison

KROP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than ILS's 1.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

KROP vs. ILS - Dividend Comparison

KROP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.45%, less than ILS's 8.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ILS Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF	8.05%	6.06%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
KROP Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF	2.45%	2.73%	1.89%	1.36%	0.71%	0.69%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KROP and ILS in my portfolio?

KROP and ILS have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KROP or ILS?

KROP has higher volatility (4.54%) compared to ILS (0.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KROP dropped -62.08% vs ILS's -2.46%.

Which ETF is better, KROP or ILS?

On 1-year performance, ILS leads with 7.81% vs 7.63% for KROP. On fees, KROP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, ILS has been the lower-risk option at 0.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, KROP or ILS?

Over the 1-year period, ILS has performed better with a 7.81% return vs 7.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, KROP or ILS?

KROP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.58% for ILS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KROP or ILS?

ILS has the higher dividend yield at 8.05%, compared with 2.45% for KROP.

What is the main difference between KROP and ILS?

KROP is categorized as Technology Equities, while ILS is Nontraditional Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Brookmont. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for KROP and 1.58% for ILS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ILS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.06 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.