KROP vs. BOTZ
KROP (Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF) and BOTZ (Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KROP is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Solactive AgTech & Food Innovation Index, while BOTZ is a Robotics fund tracking the Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, KROP returned 0.72%/yr vs 12.50%/yr for BOTZ. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. KROP charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for BOTZ.
Performance
KROP vs. BOTZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KROP achieves a 16.59% return, which is significantly higher than BOTZ's 10.63% return.
KROP
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -0.70%
- YTD
- 16.59%
- 6M
- 14.86%
- 1Y
- 12.86%
- 3Y*
- 0.72%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BOTZ
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 3.43%
- YTD
- 10.63%
- 6M
- 9.15%
- 1Y
- 28.51%
- 3Y*
- 12.50%
- 5Y*
- 3.08%
- 10Y*
- —
KROP vs. BOTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KROP Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF | 16.59% | 7.95% | -8.74% | -23.86% | -27.23% | -18.75% |
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF | 10.63% | 14.17% | 12.26% | 38.97% | -42.69% | 5.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between KROP and BOTZ is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2021 | 0.55 |
The correlation between KROP and BOTZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (1 year) to 0.55 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
KROP vs. BOTZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
KROP
BOTZ
Industrials
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
KROP
BOTZ
Basic Materials
KROP
BOTZ
Consumer Defensive
KROP
BOTZ
Healthcare
KROP
BOTZ
Consumer Cyclical
KROP
BOTZ
Communication Services
KROP
-
BOTZ
Energy
KROP
-
BOTZ
Financial Services
KROP
-
BOTZ
Real Estate
KROP
-
BOTZ
-
Technology
KROP
-
BOTZ
Utilities
KROP
-
BOTZ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KROP vs. BOTZ — Risk / Return Rank
KROP
BOTZ
KROP vs. BOTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KROP | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.21 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.14 | 1.48 | -0.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.58 | 5.08 | -2.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KROP | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 | 1.19 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.12 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.57 | 0.44 | -1.01 |
Drawdowns
KROP vs. BOTZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KROP drawdown since its inception was -61.96%, which is greater than BOTZ's maximum drawdown of -55.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KROP and BOTZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KROP | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.96% | -55.54% | -6.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.29% | -19.34% | +8.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.70% | -29.02% | +0.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -55.54% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.93% | -3.72% | -45.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.50% | -18.32% | -26.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.99% | 5.63% | -0.64% |
Volatility
KROP vs. BOTZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP) is 4.69%, while Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) has a volatility of 7.76%. This indicates that KROP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BOTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KROP | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.69% | 7.76% | -3.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.98% | 18.41% | -6.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.04% | 23.97% | -7.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.27% | 26.72% | -4.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.27% | 25.72% | -3.45% |
KROP vs. BOTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
KROP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than BOTZ's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
KROP vs. BOTZ - Dividend Comparison
KROP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.34%, more than BOTZ's 0.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF | 0.59% | 0.66% | 0.13% | 0.20% | 0.23% | 0.16% | 0.19% | 0.83% | 1.44% | 0.01% | 0.06% |
KROP Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF | 2.34% | 2.73% | 1.89% | 1.36% | 0.71% | 0.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KROP and BOTZ have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BOTZ has higher volatility (7.76%) compared to KROP (4.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KROP dropped -61.96% vs BOTZ's -55.54%.
On 3-year performance, BOTZ leads with 12.50% vs 0.72% for KROP. On fees, KROP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, KROP has been the lower-risk option at 4.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, BOTZ has performed better with a 12.50% return vs 0.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
KROP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for BOTZ.
KROP has the higher dividend yield at 2.34%, compared with 0.59% for BOTZ.
KROP is categorized as Technology Equities, while BOTZ is Robotics. KROP tracks Solactive AgTech & Food Innovation Index, while BOTZ tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for KROP and 0.68% for BOTZ.
BOTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.19 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KROP and BOTZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer