KRMA vs. NACP
KRMA (Global X Conscious Companies ETF) and NACP (Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - KRMA tracks the Concinnity Conscious Companies Index GTR Index while NACP tracks the Morningstar Minority Empowerment Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, KRMA returned 10.89%/yr vs 15.98%/yr for NACP. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. KRMA charges 0.43%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for NACP.
Performance
KRMA vs. NACP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KRMA achieves a 11.81% return, which is significantly lower than NACP's 22.18% return.
KRMA
- 1D
- -0.90%
- 1M
- 6.32%
- YTD
- 11.81%
- 6M
- 12.13%
- 1Y
- 27.87%
- 3Y*
- 18.94%
- 5Y*
- 10.89%
- 10Y*
- —
NACP
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 9.92%
- YTD
- 22.18%
- 6M
- 20.98%
- 1Y
- 43.81%
- 3Y*
- 27.18%
- 5Y*
- 15.98%
- 10Y*
- —
KRMA vs. NACP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KRMA Global X Conscious Companies ETF | 11.81% | 13.98% | 18.12% | 22.08% | -18.96% | 27.71% | 17.53% | 30.07% | -9.04% |
NACP Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF | 22.18% | 21.38% | 23.93% | 29.69% | -23.05% | 27.62% | 26.00% | 30.74% | -8.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between KRMA and NACP is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 20, 2018 | 0.86 |
The correlation between KRMA and NACP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
KRMA vs. NACP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
KRMA
NACP
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Utilities
Technology
KRMA
NACP
Financial Services
KRMA
NACP
Consumer Cyclical
KRMA
NACP
Communication Services
KRMA
NACP
Healthcare
KRMA
NACP
Industrials
KRMA
NACP
Consumer Defensive
KRMA
NACP
Energy
KRMA
NACP
Real Estate
KRMA
NACP
Basic Materials
KRMA
NACP
Utilities
KRMA
NACP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KRMA vs. NACP — Risk / Return Rank
KRMA
NACP
KRMA vs. NACP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Conscious Companies ETF (KRMA) and Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF (NACP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KRMA | NACP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.54 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.25 | 4.56 | -1.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.76 | 20.04 | -6.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KRMA | NACP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.28 | 3.14 | -0.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 | 0.92 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.75 | 0.93 | -0.18 |
Drawdowns
KRMA vs. NACP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KRMA drawdown since its inception was -36.16%, which is greater than NACP's maximum drawdown of -30.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KRMA and NACP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KRMA | NACP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.16% | -30.96% | -5.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.62% | -9.65% | +1.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.41% | -19.66% | +0.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.12% | -27.89% | +1.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.02% | -0.13% | -0.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.92% | -5.75% | +0.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.03% | 2.19% | -0.16% |
Volatility
KRMA vs. NACP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Conscious Companies ETF (KRMA) is 3.12%, while Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF (NACP) has a volatility of 4.44%. This indicates that KRMA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NACP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KRMA | NACP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.12% | 4.44% | -1.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.34% | 11.13% | -1.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.32% | 14.02% | -1.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.19% | 17.47% | -0.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.51% | 18.70% | -0.19% |
KRMA vs. NACP - Expense Ratio Comparison
KRMA has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is lower than NACP's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
KRMA vs. NACP - Dividend Comparison
KRMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.32%, more than NACP's 0.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KRMA Global X Conscious Companies ETF | 2.32% | 2.59% | 0.91% | 1.16% | 0.86% | 1.07% | 0.96% | 1.52% | 1.82% | 1.21% | 0.96% |
NACP Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF | 0.55% | 0.62% | 2.96% | 1.28% | 3.48% | 3.06% | 1.48% | 1.22% | 0.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KRMA and NACP have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NACP has higher volatility (4.44%) compared to KRMA (3.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KRMA dropped -36.16% vs NACP's -30.96%.
On 5-year performance, NACP leads with 15.98% vs 10.89% for KRMA. On fees, KRMA is cheaper at 0.43% per year. On volatility, KRMA has been the lower-risk option at 3.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, NACP has performed better with a 15.98% return vs 10.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
KRMA is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for NACP.
KRMA has the higher dividend yield at 2.32%, compared with 0.55% for NACP.
KRMA tracks Concinnity Conscious Companies Index GTR Index, while NACP tracks Morningstar Minority Empowerment Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Impact Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for KRMA and 0.49% for NACP.
NACP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.14 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KRMA and NACP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer