PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KRMA vs. NACP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KRMA vs. NACP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Conscious Companies ETF (KRMA) and Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF (NACP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KRMA achieves a 11.81% return, which is significantly lower than NACP's 22.18% return.


KRMA

1D
-0.90%
1M
6.32%
YTD
11.81%
6M
12.13%
1Y
27.87%
3Y*
18.94%
5Y*
10.89%
10Y*

NACP

1D
-0.13%
1M
9.92%
YTD
22.18%
6M
20.98%
1Y
43.81%
3Y*
27.18%
5Y*
15.98%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KRMA vs. NACP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
KRMA
Global X Conscious Companies ETF
11.81%13.98%18.12%22.08%-18.96%27.71%17.53%30.07%-9.04%
NACP
Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF
22.18%21.38%23.93%29.69%-23.05%27.62%26.00%30.74%-8.79%

Correlation

The correlation between KRMA and NACP is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 20, 2018

0.86

The correlation between KRMA and NACP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

KRMA vs. NACP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
KRMA
NACP

Technology

41.8%
35.8%

Financial Services

11.5%
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

10.8%
11.1%

Communication Services

9.4%
9.8%

Healthcare

8.7%
9.2%

Industrials

7.1%
8.7%

Consumer Defensive

3.5%
3.6%

Energy

2.7%
5.0%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.3%

Basic Materials

1.6%
1.5%

Utilities

0.9%
3.4%

Technology

KRMA
41.8%
NACP
35.8%

Financial Services

KRMA
11.5%
NACP
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

KRMA
10.8%
NACP
11.1%

Communication Services

KRMA
9.4%
NACP
9.8%

Healthcare

KRMA
8.7%
NACP
9.2%

Industrials

KRMA
7.1%
NACP
8.7%

Consumer Defensive

KRMA
3.5%
NACP
3.6%

Energy

KRMA
2.7%
NACP
5.0%

Real Estate

KRMA
1.9%
NACP
1.3%

Basic Materials

KRMA
1.6%
NACP
1.5%

Utilities

KRMA
0.9%
NACP
3.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KRMA vs. NACP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KRMA
KRMA Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
KRMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KRMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
KRMA Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
KRMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
KRMA Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

NACP
NACP Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
NACP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NACP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
NACP Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
NACP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
NACP Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KRMA vs. NACP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Conscious Companies ETF (KRMA) and Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF (NACP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KRMANACPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.54

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.25

4.56

-1.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.76

20.04

-6.28

KRMA vs. NACP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KRMA Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is comparable to the NACP Sharpe Ratio of 3.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KRMA and NACP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KRMANACPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.28

3.14

-0.86

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

0.92

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

0.93

-0.18

Drawdowns

KRMA vs. NACP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KRMA drawdown since its inception was -36.16%, which is greater than NACP's maximum drawdown of -30.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KRMA and NACP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KRMANACPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.16%

-30.96%

-5.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.62%

-9.65%

+1.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.41%

-19.66%

+0.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.12%

-27.89%

+1.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.02%

-0.13%

-0.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.92%

-5.75%

+0.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.03%

2.19%

-0.16%

Volatility

KRMA vs. NACP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Conscious Companies ETF (KRMA) is 3.12%, while Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF (NACP) has a volatility of 4.44%. This indicates that KRMA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NACP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KRMANACPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.12%

4.44%

-1.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.34%

11.13%

-1.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.32%

14.02%

-1.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.19%

17.47%

-0.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.51%

18.70%

-0.19%

KRMA vs. NACP - Expense Ratio Comparison

KRMA has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is lower than NACP's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

KRMA vs. NACP - Dividend Comparison

KRMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.32%, more than NACP's 0.55% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
KRMA
Global X Conscious Companies ETF
2.32%2.59%0.91%1.16%0.86%1.07%0.96%1.52%1.82%1.21%0.96%
NACP
Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF
0.55%0.62%2.96%1.28%3.48%3.06%1.48%1.22%0.71%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


KRMA and NACP have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NACP has higher volatility (4.44%) compared to KRMA (3.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KRMA dropped -36.16% vs NACP's -30.96%.

On 5-year performance, NACP leads with 15.98% vs 10.89% for KRMA. On fees, KRMA is cheaper at 0.43% per year. On volatility, KRMA has been the lower-risk option at 3.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, NACP has performed better with a 15.98% return vs 10.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

KRMA is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for NACP.

KRMA has the higher dividend yield at 2.32%, compared with 0.55% for NACP.

KRMA tracks Concinnity Conscious Companies Index GTR Index, while NACP tracks Morningstar Minority Empowerment Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Impact Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for KRMA and 0.49% for NACP.

NACP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.14 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KRMA and NACP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer