KRMA vs. AIQ
KRMA (Global X Conscious Companies ETF) and AIQ (Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KRMA is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Concinnity Conscious Companies Index GTR Index, while AIQ is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Indxx Artificial Intelligence & Big Data Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, KRMA returned 10.89%/yr vs 19.07%/yr for AIQ. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. KRMA charges 0.43%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for AIQ.
Performance
KRMA vs. AIQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KRMA achieves a 11.81% return, which is significantly lower than AIQ's 35.98% return.
KRMA
- 1D
- -0.90%
- 1M
- 6.32%
- YTD
- 11.81%
- 6M
- 12.13%
- 1Y
- 27.87%
- 3Y*
- 18.94%
- 5Y*
- 10.89%
- 10Y*
- —
AIQ
- 1D
- -1.40%
- 1M
- 21.10%
- YTD
- 35.98%
- 6M
- 36.15%
- 1Y
- 69.19%
- 3Y*
- 37.50%
- 5Y*
- 19.07%
- 10Y*
- —
KRMA vs. AIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KRMA Global X Conscious Companies ETF | 11.81% | 13.98% | 18.12% | 22.08% | -18.96% | 27.71% | 17.53% | 30.07% | -6.05% |
AIQ Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF | 35.98% | 31.89% | 24.11% | 55.39% | -36.44% | 17.09% | 52.88% | 39.94% | -14.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between KRMA and AIQ is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2018 | 0.79 |
The correlation between KRMA and AIQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
KRMA vs. AIQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
KRMA
AIQ
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Technology
KRMA
AIQ
Financial Services
KRMA
AIQ
Consumer Cyclical
KRMA
AIQ
Communication Services
KRMA
AIQ
Healthcare
KRMA
AIQ
Industrials
KRMA
AIQ
Consumer Defensive
KRMA
AIQ
-
Energy
KRMA
AIQ
-
Real Estate
KRMA
AIQ
-
Basic Materials
KRMA
AIQ
-
Utilities
KRMA
AIQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KRMA vs. AIQ — Risk / Return Rank
KRMA
AIQ
KRMA vs. AIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Conscious Companies ETF (KRMA) and Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KRMA | AIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.49 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.25 | 4.22 | -0.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.76 | 14.59 | -0.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KRMA | AIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.28 | 3.02 | -0.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 | 0.76 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.75 | 0.84 | -0.08 |
Drawdowns
KRMA vs. AIQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KRMA drawdown since its inception was -36.16%, smaller than the maximum AIQ drawdown of -44.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KRMA and AIQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KRMA | AIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.16% | -44.66% | +8.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.62% | -16.47% | +7.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.41% | -26.35% | +6.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.12% | -44.66% | +18.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.02% | -1.40% | +0.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.92% | -9.80% | +4.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.03% | 4.76% | -2.73% |
Volatility
KRMA vs. AIQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Conscious Companies ETF (KRMA) is 3.12%, while Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ) has a volatility of 8.60%. This indicates that KRMA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KRMA | AIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.12% | 8.60% | -5.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.34% | 18.46% | -9.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.32% | 23.04% | -10.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.19% | 25.33% | -8.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.51% | 25.50% | -6.99% |
KRMA vs. AIQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
KRMA has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is lower than AIQ's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
KRMA vs. AIQ - Dividend Comparison
KRMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.32%, more than AIQ's 0.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIQ Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF | 0.14% | 0.18% | 0.14% | 0.16% | 0.56% | 0.15% | 0.50% | 0.51% | 0.51% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KRMA Global X Conscious Companies ETF | 2.32% | 2.59% | 0.91% | 1.16% | 0.86% | 1.07% | 0.96% | 1.52% | 1.82% | 1.21% | 0.96% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KRMA and AIQ have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AIQ has higher volatility (8.60%) compared to KRMA (3.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KRMA dropped -36.16% vs AIQ's -44.66%.
On 5-year performance, AIQ leads with 19.07% vs 10.89% for KRMA. On fees, KRMA is cheaper at 0.43% per year. On volatility, KRMA has been the lower-risk option at 3.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, AIQ has performed better with a 19.07% return vs 10.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
KRMA is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for AIQ.
KRMA has the higher dividend yield at 2.32%, compared with 0.14% for AIQ.
KRMA is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while AIQ is Technology Equities. KRMA tracks Concinnity Conscious Companies Index GTR Index, while AIQ tracks Indxx Artificial Intelligence & Big Data Index. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for KRMA and 0.68% for AIQ.
AIQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KRMA and AIQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer