PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KRE vs. XLE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KRE vs. XLE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF (KRE) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KRE achieves a 5.35% return, which is significantly lower than XLE's 32.17% return. Over the past 10 years, KRE has underperformed XLE with an annualized return of 7.80%, while XLE has yielded a comparatively higher 10.22% annualized return.


KRE

1D
-2.39%
1M
-1.61%
YTD
5.35%
6M
6.27%
1Y
21.36%
3Y*
20.63%
5Y*
1.92%
10Y*
7.80%

XLE

1D
1.29%
1M
-1.14%
YTD
32.17%
6M
29.80%
1Y
45.00%
3Y*
17.46%
5Y*
20.44%
10Y*
10.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KRE vs. XLE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KRE
SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF
5.35%10.21%18.58%-7.61%-15.08%39.29%-7.43%27.44%-18.81%7.49%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
32.17%7.88%5.56%-0.63%64.32%53.28%-32.67%11.74%-18.22%-0.89%

Correlation

The correlation between KRE and XLE is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2006

0.50

Over the past year, the correlation between KRE and XLE has dropped to 0.11 - well below their long-term average of 0.50, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

KRE vs. XLE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
KRE
XLE

Financial Services

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

100.0%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

KRE
100.0%
XLE

-

Basic Materials

KRE

-

XLE

-

Communication Services

KRE

-

XLE

-

Consumer Cyclical

KRE

-

XLE

-

Consumer Defensive

KRE

-

XLE

-

Energy

KRE

-

XLE
100.0%

Healthcare

KRE

-

XLE

-

Industrials

KRE

-

XLE

-

Real Estate

KRE

-

XLE

-

Technology

KRE

-

XLE

-

Utilities

KRE

-

XLE

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KRE vs. XLE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KRE
KRE Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
KRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
KRE Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
KRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
KRE Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

XLE
XLE Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
XLE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLE Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
XLE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLE Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KRE vs. XLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF (KRE) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KREXLEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.92

2.21

-1.29

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.39

2.84

-1.45

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.35

-0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.44

3.75

-2.32

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.72

10.92

-7.20

KRE vs. XLE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KRE Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is lower than the XLE Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KRE and XLE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KREXLEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

2.21

-1.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

0.79

-0.73

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

0.35

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.13

0.31

-0.18

Drawdowns

KRE vs. XLE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KRE drawdown since its inception was -68.54%, roughly equal to the maximum XLE drawdown of -71.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KRE and XLE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KREXLEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.54%

-71.26%

+2.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.95%

-12.05%

-2.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.20%

-20.14%

-8.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.69%

-26.04%

-26.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.92%

-66.81%

+11.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.27%

-6.15%

-1.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.90%

-17.98%

-3.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.75%

4.14%

+1.61%

Volatility

KRE vs. XLE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF (KRE) is 6.14%, while State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) has a volatility of 8.25%. This indicates that KRE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KREXLEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.14%

8.25%

-2.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.84%

16.58%

-0.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.37%

20.53%

+2.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.98%

26.02%

+3.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.92%

29.59%

+2.33%

KRE vs. XLE - Expense Ratio Comparison

KRE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than XLE's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

KRE vs. XLE - Dividend Comparison

KRE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.32%, less than XLE's 2.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KRE
SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF
2.32%2.45%2.59%2.99%2.51%1.97%2.78%2.21%2.48%1.40%1.40%1.80%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.54%3.28%3.36%3.55%3.68%4.21%5.62%6.72%3.54%3.03%2.26%3.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


KRE and XLE have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLE has higher volatility (8.25%) compared to KRE (6.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KRE dropped -68.54% vs XLE's -71.26%.

On 10-year performance, XLE leads with 10.22% vs 7.80% for KRE. On fees, XLE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, KRE has been the lower-risk option at 6.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XLE has performed better with a 10.22% return vs 7.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for KRE.

XLE has the higher dividend yield at 2.54%, compared with 2.32% for KRE.

KRE is categorized as Financials Equities, while XLE is Energy Equities. KRE tracks S&P Regional Banks Select Industry Index, while XLE tracks Energy Select Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for KRE and 0.08% for XLE.

XLE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KRE and XLE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer