KQQQ vs. CHAT

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF (KQQQ) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT).

KQQQ and CHAT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. KQQQ is an actively managed fund by Kurv. It was launched on Jul 22, 2024. CHAT is an actively managed fund by Roundhill. It was launched on May 17, 2023.

Performance

KQQQ vs. CHAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF (KQQQ) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

KQQQ vs. CHAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
KQQQ Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF	-10.02%	16.64%	11.46%
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF	4.90%	49.85%	10.52%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KQQQ achieves a -10.02% return, which is significantly lower than CHAT's 4.90% return.

KQQQ

• 1D: 3.60%
• 1M: -4.66%
• YTD: -10.02%
• 6M: -9.48%
• 1Y: 20.72%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CHAT

• 1D: 4.72%
• 1M: -3.19%
• YTD: 4.90%
• 6M: 3.42%
• 1Y: 82.50%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KQQQ vs. CHAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

KQQQ has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than CHAT's 0.75% expense ratio.

KQQQ

Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF

CHAT

Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF

Return for Risk

KQQQ vs. CHAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KQQQ

KQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 52
KQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
KQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
KQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 55
KQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
KQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 44

CHAT

CHAT Risk / Return Rank: 95
CHAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
CHAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
CHAT Omega Ratio Rank: 94
CHAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
CHAT Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KQQQ vs. CHAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF (KQQQ) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	KQQQ	CHAT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.89	2.42	-1.53
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.40	3.04	-1.64
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.42	-0.22
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.19	4.94	-3.75
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.95	13.74	-9.79
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

KQQQ vs. CHAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KQQQ Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is lower than the CHAT Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KQQQ and CHAT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KQQQ	CHAT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89	2.42	-1.53
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.42	1.27	-0.85

Correlation

The correlation between KQQQ and CHAT is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

KQQQ vs. CHAT - Dividend Comparison

KQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.93%, more than CHAT's 2.72% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024
KQQQ Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF	16.93%	12.01%	2.48%
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF	2.72%	2.85%	0.00%

Drawdowns

KQQQ vs. CHAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KQQQ drawdown since its inception was -26.15%, smaller than the maximum CHAT drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KQQQ and CHAT.

Drawdown Indicators

	KQQQ	CHAT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.15%	-31.34%	+5.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.30%	-16.28%	-1.02%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.32%	-6.73%	-7.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.93%	-5.61%	+0.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.23%	5.85%	-0.62%

Volatility

KQQQ vs. CHAT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF (KQQQ) is 6.99%, while Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) has a volatility of 13.21%. This indicates that KQQQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KQQQ	CHAT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.99%	13.21%	-6.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.30%	23.24%	-9.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.45%	34.27%	-10.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.55%	29.27%	-5.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.55%	29.27%	-5.72%