CHAT vs. QQQI

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

CHAT (Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF) and QQQI (NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CHAT is a Artificial Intelligence fund actively managed by Roundhill, while QQQI is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Neos. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CHAT returned 68.87% vs 17.94% for QQQI. Their correlation of 0.86 means they have usually moved in the same direction. CHAT charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for QQQI.

Performance

CHAT vs. QQQI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHAT achieves a 39.01% return, which is significantly higher than QQQI's 6.90% return.

CHAT

• 1D: 2.22%
• 1M: -7.69%
• 6M: 32.64%
• YTD: 39.01%
• 1Y: 68.87%
• 3Y*: 40.54%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 45.20%

QQQI

• 1D: 0.68%
• 1M: -3.08%
• 6M: 5.69%
• YTD: 6.90%
• 1Y: 17.94%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 18.07%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF	$58.63M	$57.19M	$67.40M
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	$341.25M	$334.46M	$358.36M

CHAT vs. QQQI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF	39.01%	49.85%	22.61%
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	6.90%	18.62%	19.44%

Correlation

The correlation between CHAT and QQQI is 0.85, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2024	0.86

The correlation between CHAT and QQQI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

CHAT vs. QQQI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CHAT	QQQI
Technology	78.9%	59.9%
Communication Services	15.2%	12.1%
Industrials	3.6%	4.3%
Consumer Cyclical	2.3%	10.0%
Financial Services	0.0%	0.2%
Basic Materials	-	1.1%
Consumer Defensive	-	6.5%
Energy	-	0.5%
Healthcare	-	3.7%
Real Estate	-	0.1%
Utilities	-	1.2%

Return for Risk

CHAT vs. QQQI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CHAT

CHAT Risk / Return Rank: 66
CHAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
CHAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
CHAT Omega Ratio Rank: 64
CHAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
CHAT Martin Ratio Rank: 66

QQQI

QQQI Risk / Return Rank: 43
QQQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
QQQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
QQQI Omega Ratio Rank: 39
QQQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
QQQI Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CHAT vs. QQQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CHAT	QQQI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.63	0.98	+0.65
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.08	1.42	+0.67
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.18	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.25	1.67	+0.58
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.96	6.03	+1.93

CHAT vs. QQQI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHAT Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is higher than the QQQI Sharpe Ratio of 0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHAT and QQQI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CHAT vs. QQQI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHAT drawdown since its inception was -31.34%, which is greater than QQQI's maximum drawdown of -20.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHAT and QQQI.

Drawdown Indicators

	CHAT	QQQI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.34%	-20.00%	-11.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-28.34%	-9.61%	-18.73%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-31.34%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-21.25%	-5.92%	-15.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.73%	-2.27%	-3.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.01%	2.67%	+5.34%

Volatility

CHAT vs. QQQI - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) has a higher volatility of 16.74% compared to NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) at 6.53%. This indicates that CHAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CHAT	QQQI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.74%	6.53%	+10.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	34.39%	13.66%	+20.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	39.18%	16.35%	+22.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.41%	17.75%	+14.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.41%	17.75%	+14.66%

CHAT vs. QQQI - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHAT has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQI's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

CHAT vs. QQQI - Dividend Comparison

CHAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.05%, less than QQQI's 14.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF	2.05%	2.85%	0.00%
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	14.38%	13.82%	12.85%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CHAT and QQQI in my portfolio?

CHAT and QQQI have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CHAT or QQQI?

CHAT has higher volatility (16.74%) compared to QQQI (6.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHAT dropped -31.34% vs QQQI's -20.00%.

Which ETF is better, CHAT or QQQI?

On 1-year performance, CHAT leads with 68.87% vs 17.94% for QQQI. On fees, QQQI is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, QQQI has been the lower-risk option at 6.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CHAT or QQQI?

Over the 1-year period, CHAT has performed better with a 68.87% return vs 17.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CHAT or QQQI?

QQQI is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for CHAT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CHAT or QQQI?

QQQI has the higher dividend yield at 14.38%, compared with 2.05% for CHAT.

What is the main difference between CHAT and QQQI?

CHAT is categorized as Artificial Intelligence, while QQQI is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CHAT and 0.68% for QQQI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CHAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.