KQQQ vs. AMZW

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

KQQQ (Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF) and AMZW (Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KQQQ is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Kurv, while AMZW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, KQQQ returned 30.24% vs 6.63% for AMZW. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.

Performance

KQQQ vs. AMZW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF (KQQQ) and Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF (AMZW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KQQQ achieves a 12.10% return, which is significantly higher than AMZW's -0.73% return.

KQQQ

• 1D: -1.78%
• 1M: -3.45%
• YTD: 12.10%
• 6M: 10.72%
• 1Y: 30.24%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AMZW

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: -14.89%
• YTD: -0.73%
• 6M: -1.71%
• 1Y: 6.63%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KQQQ vs. AMZW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
KQQQ Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF	12.10%	18.25%
AMZW Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF	-0.73%	7.33%

Correlation

The correlation between KQQQ and AMZW is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.62
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2025	0.62

The correlation between KQQQ and AMZW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

KQQQ vs. AMZW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	KQQQ	AMZW
Technology	50.8%	-
Communication Services	28.7%	-
Consumer Cyclical	17.9%	24.5%
Industrials	2.6%	-
Financial Services	1.3%	-
Healthcare	0.1%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

KQQQ vs. AMZW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KQQQ

KQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 44
KQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
KQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
KQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 46
KQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
KQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 39

AMZW

AMZW Risk / Return Rank: 12
AMZW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
AMZW Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
AMZW Omega Ratio Rank: 12
AMZW Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
AMZW Martin Ratio Rank: 11

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KQQQ vs. AMZW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF (KQQQ) and Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF (AMZW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KQQQ	AMZW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.56	0.18	+1.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.14	0.52	+1.62
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.06	+0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.76	0.25	+1.51
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.68	0.56	+5.12

KQQQ vs. AMZW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KQQQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is higher than the AMZW Sharpe Ratio of 0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KQQQ and AMZW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

KQQQ vs. AMZW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KQQQ drawdown since its inception was -26.15%, roughly equal to the maximum AMZW drawdown of -26.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KQQQ and AMZW.

Drawdown Indicators

	KQQQ	AMZW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.15%	-26.79%	+0.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.30%	-26.79%	+9.49%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.92%	-18.25%	+11.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.69%	-9.19%	+4.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.34%	11.87%	-6.53%

Volatility

KQQQ vs. AMZW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF (KQQQ) is 8.23%, while Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF (AMZW) has a volatility of 12.09%. This indicates that KQQQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMZW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KQQQ	AMZW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.23%	12.09%	-3.86%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.86%	26.19%	-10.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.53%	37.44%	-17.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.72%	37.27%	-13.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.72%	37.27%	-13.55%

KQQQ vs. AMZW - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both KQQQ and AMZW have an expense ratio of 0.99%.

Dividends

KQQQ vs. AMZW - Dividend Comparison

KQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.59%, less than AMZW's 49.16% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
AMZW Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF	49.16%	25.29%	0.00%
KQQQ Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF	14.59%	12.01%	2.48%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KQQQ and AMZW in my portfolio?

KQQQ and AMZW have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KQQQ or AMZW?

AMZW has higher volatility (12.09%) compared to KQQQ (8.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KQQQ dropped -26.15% vs AMZW's -26.79%.

Which ETF is better, KQQQ or AMZW?

On 1-year performance, KQQQ leads with 30.24% vs 6.63% for AMZW. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, KQQQ has been the lower-risk option at 8.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, KQQQ or AMZW?

Over the 1-year period, KQQQ has performed better with a 30.24% return vs 6.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, KQQQ or AMZW?

KQQQ and AMZW have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KQQQ or AMZW?

AMZW has the higher dividend yield at 49.16%, compared with 14.59% for KQQQ.

What is the main difference between KQQQ and AMZW?

KQQQ is categorized as Technology Equities, while AMZW is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Kurv and Roundhill.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

KQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.