KPRO vs. SAUG
KPRO (KraneShares 100% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF) and SAUG (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - August) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, KPRO returned -1.92% vs 19.51% for SAUG. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KPRO charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for SAUG.
Performance
KPRO vs. SAUG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KPRO achieves a -5.12% return, which is significantly lower than SAUG's 7.65% return.
KPRO
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- -1.53%
- YTD
- -5.12%
- 6M
- -9.44%
- 1Y
- -1.92%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SAUG
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 1.58%
- YTD
- 7.65%
- 6M
- 7.95%
- 1Y
- 19.51%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KPRO vs. SAUG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
KPRO KraneShares 100% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF | -5.12% | 7.79% | 12.68% |
SAUG FT Cboe Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - August | 7.65% | 8.23% | 12.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between KPRO and SAUG is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2024 | 0.34 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KPRO vs. SAUG — Risk / Return Rank
KPRO
SAUG
KPRO vs. SAUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares 100% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KPRO) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - August (SAUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KPRO | SAUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.39 | -0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.16 | 4.78 | -4.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.32 | 15.56 | -15.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KPRO | SAUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.22 | 2.05 | -2.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.81 | 1.03 | -0.22 |
Drawdowns
KPRO vs. SAUG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KPRO drawdown since its inception was -11.92%, smaller than the maximum SAUG drawdown of -14.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KPRO and SAUG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KPRO | SAUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.92% | -14.62% | +2.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.92% | -4.10% | -7.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.91% | -0.19% | -11.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.40% | -2.24% | -0.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.01% | 1.26% | +4.75% |
Volatility
KPRO vs. SAUG - Volatility Comparison
KraneShares 100% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KPRO) has a higher volatility of 2.71% compared to FT Cboe Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - August (SAUG) at 1.22%. This indicates that KPRO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SAUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KPRO | SAUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.71% | 1.22% | +1.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.98% | 5.41% | +2.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.86% | 9.59% | -0.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.83% | 11.81% | -3.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.83% | 11.81% | -3.98% |
KPRO vs. SAUG - Expense Ratio Comparison
KPRO has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SAUG's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
KPRO vs. SAUG - Dividend Comparison
KPRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%, while SAUG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
KPRO KraneShares 100% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF | 2.79% | 2.65% | 3.70% |
SAUG FT Cboe Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - August | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KPRO and SAUG have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KPRO has higher volatility (2.71%) compared to SAUG (1.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KPRO dropped -11.92% vs SAUG's -14.62%.
On 1-year performance, SAUG leads with 19.51% vs -1.92% for KPRO. On fees, SAUG is cheaper at 0.90% per year. On volatility, SAUG has been the lower-risk option at 1.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SAUG has performed better with a 19.51% return vs -1.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SAUG is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for KPRO.
KPRO has the higher dividend yield at 2.79%, compared with 0.00% for SAUG.
They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for KPRO and 0.90% for SAUG.
SAUG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs -0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KPRO and SAUG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer