KPRO vs. LAPR
KPRO (KraneShares 100% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF) and LAPR (Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - April) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, KPRO returned -1.92% vs 7.01% for LAPR. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KPRO charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for LAPR.
Performance
KPRO vs. LAPR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KPRO achieves a -5.12% return, which is significantly lower than LAPR's 3.32% return.
KPRO
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- -1.53%
- YTD
- -5.12%
- 6M
- -9.44%
- 1Y
- -1.92%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LAPR
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.72%
- YTD
- 3.32%
- 6M
- 3.77%
- 1Y
- 7.01%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KPRO vs. LAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
KPRO KraneShares 100% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF | -5.12% | 7.79% | 9.95% |
LAPR Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - April | 3.32% | 5.81% | 4.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between KPRO and LAPR is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024 | 0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KPRO vs. LAPR — Risk / Return Rank
KPRO
LAPR
KPRO vs. LAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares 100% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KPRO) and Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - April (LAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KPRO | LAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.22 | 5.58 | -5.79 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.21 | 12.13 | -12.34 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 2.93 | -1.96 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.16 | 29.36 | -29.52 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.32 | 144.96 | -145.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KPRO | LAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.22 | 5.58 | -5.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.81 | 1.97 | -1.16 |
Drawdowns
KPRO vs. LAPR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KPRO drawdown since its inception was -11.92%, which is greater than LAPR's maximum drawdown of -3.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KPRO and LAPR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KPRO | LAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.92% | -3.81% | -8.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.92% | -0.24% | -11.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.91% | -0.12% | -11.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.40% | -0.11% | -2.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.01% | 0.05% | +5.96% |
Volatility
KPRO vs. LAPR - Volatility Comparison
KraneShares 100% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KPRO) has a higher volatility of 2.71% compared to Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - April (LAPR) at 0.32%. This indicates that KPRO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KPRO | LAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.71% | 0.32% | +2.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.98% | 1.00% | +6.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.86% | 1.27% | +7.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.83% | 3.30% | +4.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.83% | 3.30% | +4.53% |
KPRO vs. LAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison
KPRO has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than LAPR's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
KPRO vs. LAPR - Dividend Comparison
KPRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%, less than LAPR's 5.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
KPRO KraneShares 100% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF | 2.79% | 2.65% | 3.70% |
LAPR Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - April | 5.53% | 5.40% | 4.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KPRO and LAPR have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KPRO has higher volatility (2.71%) compared to LAPR (0.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KPRO dropped -11.92% vs LAPR's -3.81%.
On 1-year performance, LAPR leads with 7.01% vs -1.92% for KPRO. On fees, LAPR is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, LAPR has been the lower-risk option at 0.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, LAPR has performed better with a 7.01% return vs -1.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LAPR is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for KPRO.
LAPR has the higher dividend yield at 5.53%, compared with 2.79% for KPRO.
They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for KPRO and 0.79% for LAPR.
LAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.58 vs -0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KPRO and LAPR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer