LAPR vs. PYLD

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

LAPR (Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - April) and PYLD (PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - LAPR is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Innovator, while PYLD is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by PIMCO. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, LAPR returned 6.94% vs 6.87% for PYLD. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LAPR charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for PYLD.

Performance

LAPR vs. PYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - April (LAPR) and PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LAPR achieves a 3.40% return, which is significantly higher than PYLD's 1.18% return.

LAPR

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 0.24%
• YTD: 3.40%
• 6M: 3.51%
• 1Y: 6.94%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PYLD

• 1D: -0.30%
• 1M: 0.70%
• YTD: 1.18%
• 6M: 1.40%
• 1Y: 6.87%
• 3Y*: 7.98%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LAPR vs. PYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
LAPR Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - April	3.40%	5.81%	4.66%
PYLD PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund	1.18%	9.57%	5.88%

Correlation

The correlation between LAPR and PYLD is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.39
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2024	0.29

Return for Risk

LAPR vs. PYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LAPR

LAPR Risk / Return Rank: 99
LAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
LAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
LAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 99
LAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
LAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 99

PYLD

PYLD Risk / Return Rank: 66
PYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
PYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
PYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 78
PYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
PYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LAPR vs. PYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - April (LAPR) and PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LAPR	PYLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	5.57	2.24	+3.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	12.09	3.27	+8.81
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	2.87	1.44	+1.43
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	19.59	2.13	+17.47
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	113.23	9.63	+103.60

LAPR vs. PYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LAPR Sharpe Ratio is 5.57, which is higher than the PYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LAPR and PYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LAPR vs. PYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LAPR drawdown since its inception was -3.81%, smaller than the maximum PYLD drawdown of -4.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LAPR and PYLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	LAPR	PYLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.81%	-4.52%	+0.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.36%	-3.25%	+2.89%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-4.52%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.04%	-0.53%	+0.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.12%	-0.64%	+0.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.06%	0.72%	-0.66%

Volatility

LAPR vs. PYLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - April (LAPR) is 0.44%, while PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD) has a volatility of 1.06%. This indicates that LAPR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LAPR	PYLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.44%	1.06%	-0.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.05%	2.62%	-1.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.25%	3.08%	-1.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.27%	3.99%	-0.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.27%	3.99%	-0.72%

LAPR vs. PYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

LAPR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than PYLD's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

LAPR vs. PYLD - Dividend Comparison

LAPR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.52%, less than PYLD's 6.28% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
LAPR Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - April	5.52%	5.40%	4.21%	0.00%
PYLD PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund	6.28%	6.21%	6.40%	2.72%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LAPR and PYLD in my portfolio?

LAPR and PYLD have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LAPR or PYLD?

PYLD has higher volatility (1.06%) compared to LAPR (0.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LAPR dropped -3.81% vs PYLD's -4.52%.

Which ETF is better, LAPR or PYLD?

On 1-year performance, LAPR leads with 6.94% vs 6.87% for PYLD. On fees, PYLD is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, LAPR has been the lower-risk option at 0.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LAPR or PYLD?

Over the 1-year period, LAPR has performed better with a 6.94% return vs 6.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LAPR or PYLD?

PYLD is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for LAPR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LAPR or PYLD?

PYLD has the higher dividend yield at 6.28%, compared with 5.52% for LAPR.

What is the main difference between LAPR and PYLD?

LAPR is categorized as Options Trading, while PYLD is Multisector Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for LAPR and 0.55% for PYLD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.57 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.