KPRO vs. BNDD
KPRO (KraneShares 100% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF) and BNDD (Quadratic Deflation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KPRO is a Options Trading fund actively managed by KraneShares, while BNDD is a Government Bonds fund actively managed by KraneShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, KPRO returned -1.92% vs 3.39% for BNDD. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KPRO charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.02%/yr for BNDD.
Performance
KPRO vs. BNDD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KPRO achieves a -5.12% return, which is significantly lower than BNDD's 4.32% return.
KPRO
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- -1.53%
- YTD
- -5.12%
- 6M
- -9.44%
- 1Y
- -1.92%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BNDD
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 1.37%
- YTD
- 4.32%
- 6M
- 2.24%
- 1Y
- 3.39%
- 3Y*
- -3.91%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KPRO vs. BNDD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
KPRO KraneShares 100% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF | -5.12% | 7.79% | 12.68% |
BNDD Quadratic Deflation ETF | 4.32% | -8.17% | -3.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between KPRO and BNDD is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2024 | 0.03 |
KPRO vs. BNDD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
KPRO
BNDD
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Technology
-
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Energy
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Communication Services
KPRO
BNDD
-
Consumer Cyclical
KPRO
BNDD
-
Healthcare
KPRO
BNDD
-
Real Estate
KPRO
BNDD
-
Consumer Defensive
KPRO
BNDD
-
Technology
KPRO
BNDD
-
Financial Services
KPRO
BNDD
Basic Materials
KPRO
-
BNDD
-
Energy
KPRO
-
BNDD
-
Industrials
KPRO
-
BNDD
-
Utilities
KPRO
-
BNDD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KPRO vs. BNDD — Risk / Return Rank
KPRO
BNDD
KPRO vs. BNDD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares 100% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KPRO) and Quadratic Deflation ETF (BNDD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KPRO | BNDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.22 | 0.32 | -0.54 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.21 | 0.52 | -0.73 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.06 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.16 | 0.56 | -0.72 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.32 | 1.20 | -1.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KPRO | BNDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.22 | 0.32 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.81 | -0.33 | +1.14 |
Drawdowns
KPRO vs. BNDD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KPRO drawdown since its inception was -11.92%, smaller than the maximum BNDD drawdown of -30.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KPRO and BNDD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KPRO | BNDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.92% | -30.87% | +18.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.92% | -6.09% | -5.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -20.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.91% | -26.51% | +14.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.40% | -19.34% | +16.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.01% | 2.83% | +3.18% |
Volatility
KPRO vs. BNDD - Volatility Comparison
KraneShares 100% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KPRO) has a higher volatility of 2.71% compared to Quadratic Deflation ETF (BNDD) at 2.21%. This indicates that KPRO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BNDD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KPRO | BNDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.71% | 2.21% | +0.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.98% | 8.11% | -0.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.86% | 10.59% | -1.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.83% | 13.38% | -5.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.83% | 13.38% | -5.55% |
KPRO vs. BNDD - Expense Ratio Comparison
KPRO has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than BNDD's 1.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
KPRO vs. BNDD - Dividend Comparison
KPRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%, less than BNDD's 3.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BNDD Quadratic Deflation ETF | 3.61% | 3.82% | 3.85% | 4.30% | 43.17% | 1.04% |
KPRO KraneShares 100% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF | 2.79% | 2.65% | 3.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KPRO and BNDD have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KPRO has higher volatility (2.71%) compared to BNDD (2.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KPRO dropped -11.92% vs BNDD's -30.87%.
On 1-year performance, BNDD leads with 3.39% vs -1.92% for KPRO. On fees, KPRO is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, BNDD has been the lower-risk option at 2.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BNDD has performed better with a 3.39% return vs -1.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
KPRO is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.02% for BNDD.
BNDD has the higher dividend yield at 3.61%, compared with 2.79% for KPRO.
KPRO is categorized as Options Trading, while BNDD is Government Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for KPRO and 1.02% for BNDD.
BNDD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.32 vs -0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KPRO and BNDD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer