KPHO vs. BNDD
KPHO (KraneShares Dragon Capital Vietnam Growth Index ETF) and BNDD (Quadratic Deflation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KPHO is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the Dragon Capital Merqube Vietnam Growth Index, while BNDD is a Government Bonds fund actively managed by KraneShares. KPHO is passively managed, while BNDD is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. KPHO charges 1.03%/yr vs 1.02%/yr for BNDD.
Performance
KPHO vs. BNDD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KPHO achieves a -6.02% return, which is significantly lower than BNDD's 7.17% return.
KPHO
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- -1.23%
- YTD
- -6.02%
- 6M
- 5.53%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BNDD
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- 3.67%
- YTD
- 7.17%
- 6M
- 5.54%
- 1Y
- 4.44%
- 3Y*
- -4.02%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KPHO vs. BNDD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
KPHO KraneShares Dragon Capital Vietnam Growth Index ETF | -6.02% | 9.46% |
BNDD Quadratic Deflation ETF | 7.17% | -1.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between KPHO and BNDD is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2025 | -0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KPHO vs. BNDD — Risk / Return Rank
KPHO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BNDD
KPHO vs. BNDD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Dragon Capital Vietnam Growth Index ETF (KPHO) and Quadratic Deflation ETF (BNDD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KPHO | BNDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.08 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.73 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 1.57 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KPHO vs. BNDD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KPHO drawdown since its inception was -14.34%, smaller than the maximum BNDD drawdown of -30.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KPHO and BNDD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KPHO | BNDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.34% | -30.87% | +16.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.09% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -20.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.21% | -24.50% | +13.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.35% | -19.39% | +13.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.82% | — |
Volatility
KPHO vs. BNDD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KPHO | BNDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.65% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.28% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.87% | 10.51% | +17.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.87% | 13.34% | +14.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.87% | 13.34% | +14.53% |
KPHO vs. BNDD - Expense Ratio Comparison
KPHO has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than BNDD's 1.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
KPHO vs. BNDD - Dividend Comparison
KPHO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.06%, more than BNDD's 3.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BNDD Quadratic Deflation ETF | 3.51% | 3.82% | 3.85% | 4.30% | 43.17% | 1.04% |
KPHO KraneShares Dragon Capital Vietnam Growth Index ETF | 11.06% | 10.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KPHO and BNDD have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BNDD is cheaper at 1.02% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BNDD is cheaper with a 1.02% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for KPHO.
KPHO has the higher dividend yield at 11.06%, compared with 3.51% for BNDD.
KPHO is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while BNDD is Government Bonds. Their fees differ too: 1.03% for KPHO and 1.02% for BNDD.
Find the right allocation for KPHO and BNDD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer