PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KPDD vs. MSTZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KPDD vs. MSTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares 2x Long PDD Daily ETF (KPDD) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KPDD achieves a -51.43% return, which is significantly lower than MSTZ's -23.27% return.


KPDD

1D
-1.41%
1M
5.28%
6M
-55.43%
YTD
-51.43%
1Y
-48.40%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MSTZ

1D
5.07%
1M
46.38%
6M
-9.68%
YTD
-23.27%
1Y
282.56%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KPDD vs. MSTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
KPDD
KraneShares 2x Long PDD Daily ETF
-51.43%-26.34%
MSTZ
T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF
-23.27%-15.43%

Correlation

The correlation between KPDD and MSTZ is -0.25, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2025

-0.28

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KPDD vs. MSTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KPDD
KPDD Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
KPDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KPDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
KPDD Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
KPDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
KPDD Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

MSTZ
MSTZ Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
MSTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
MSTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KPDD vs. MSTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares 2x Long PDD Daily ETF (KPDD) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KPDDMSTZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.89

1.32

-0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.64

3.35

-3.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.17

6.53

-7.70

KPDD vs. MSTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KPDD Sharpe Ratio is -0.72, which is lower than the MSTZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KPDD and MSTZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KPDD vs. MSTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KPDD drawdown since its inception was -77.47%, smaller than the maximum MSTZ drawdown of -99.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KPDD and MSTZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KPDDMSTZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.47%

-99.38%

+21.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-75.88%

-84.89%

+9.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-70.47%

-97.39%

+26.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-39.81%

-94.53%

+54.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

41.32%

43.51%

-2.19%

Volatility

KPDD vs. MSTZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for KraneShares 2x Long PDD Daily ETF (KPDD) is 22.97%, while T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) has a volatility of 56.56%. This indicates that KPDD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KPDDMSTZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.97%

56.56%

-33.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

53.60%

135.11%

-81.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

67.58%

148.53%

-80.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

74.67%

171.02%

-96.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

74.67%

171.02%

-96.35%

KPDD vs. MSTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

KPDD has a 1.27% expense ratio, which is higher than MSTZ's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

KPDD vs. MSTZ - Dividend Comparison

KPDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 119.16%, while MSTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


KPDD and MSTZ have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSTZ has higher volatility (56.56%) compared to KPDD (22.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KPDD dropped -77.47% vs MSTZ's -99.38%.

On 1-year performance, MSTZ leads with 282.56% vs -48.40% for KPDD. On fees, MSTZ is cheaper at 1.05% per year. On volatility, KPDD has been the lower-risk option at 22.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MSTZ has performed better with a 282.56% return vs -48.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MSTZ is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.27% for KPDD.

KPDD has the higher dividend yield at 119.16%, compared with 0.00% for MSTZ.

KPDD is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while MSTZ is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and REX. Their fees differ too: 1.27% for KPDD and 1.05% for MSTZ.

MSTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs -0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KPDD and MSTZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer