PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KPDD vs. KRBN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KPDD vs. KRBN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares 2x Long PDD Daily ETF (KPDD) and KraneShares Global Carbon Strategy ETF (KRBN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KPDD achieves a -45.34% return, which is significantly lower than KRBN's -4.92% return.


KPDD

1D
3.63%
1M
17.82%
6M
-32.91%
YTD
-45.34%
1Y
-46.58%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-47.94%

KRBN

1D
-0.27%
1M
1.51%
6M
0.75%
YTD
-4.92%
1Y
14.02%
3Y*
0.62%
5Y*
5.83%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
16.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$764.43K$792.49K$2.11M
$1.61M$1.01M$686.57K

KPDD vs. KRBN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
KPDD
KraneShares 2x Long PDD Daily ETF
-45.34%-26.34%
KRBN
KraneShares Global Carbon Strategy ETF
-4.92%29.56%

Correlation

The correlation between KPDD and KRBN is 0.08, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2025

0.10

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KPDD vs. KRBN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

KPDD
KPDD Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
KPDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KPDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
KPDD Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
KPDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
KPDD Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

KRBN
KRBN Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
KRBN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KRBN Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
KRBN Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
KRBN Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
KRBN Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

KPDD vs. KRBN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares 2x Long PDD Daily ETF (KPDD) and KraneShares Global Carbon Strategy ETF (KRBN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KPDDKRBNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.90

1.14

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.62

0.56

-1.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.05

1.39

-2.44

KPDD vs. KRBN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KPDD Sharpe Ratio is -0.70, which is lower than the KRBN Sharpe Ratio of 0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KPDD and KRBN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KPDD vs. KRBN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KPDD drawdown since its inception was -77.47%, which is greater than KRBN's maximum drawdown of -36.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KPDD and KRBN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KPDDKRBNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.47%

-36.42%

-41.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-75.88%

-24.98%

-50.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-66.76%

-13.32%

-53.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-41.10%

-16.07%

-25.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

44.45%

10.10%

+34.35%

Volatility

KPDD vs. KRBN - Volatility Comparison

KraneShares 2x Long PDD Daily ETF (KPDD) has a higher volatility of 15.80% compared to KraneShares Global Carbon Strategy ETF (KRBN) at 6.67%. This indicates that KPDD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KRBN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KPDDKRBNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.80%

6.67%

+9.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

52.87%

16.21%

+36.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

67.20%

19.77%

+47.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

74.03%

27.84%

+46.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

74.03%

28.43%

+45.60%

KPDD vs. KRBN - Expense Ratio Comparison

KPDD has a 1.27% expense ratio, which is higher than KRBN's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

KPDD vs. KRBN - Dividend Comparison

KPDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 105.88%, more than KRBN's 2.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
KPDD
KraneShares 2x Long PDD Daily ETF
105.88%57.87%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
KRBN
KraneShares Global Carbon Strategy ETF
2.00%1.90%7.10%7.60%22.91%0.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


KPDD and KRBN have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KPDD has higher volatility (15.80%) compared to KRBN (6.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KPDD dropped -77.47% vs KRBN's -36.42%.

On 1-year performance, KRBN leads with 14.02% vs -46.58% for KPDD. On fees, KRBN is cheaper at 0.90% per year. On volatility, KRBN has been the lower-risk option at 6.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, KRBN has performed better with a 14.02% return vs -46.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

KRBN is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 1.27% for KPDD.

KPDD has the higher dividend yield at 105.88%, compared with 2.00% for KRBN.

KPDD is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while KRBN is Commodities. KPDD tracks PDD Holdings Inc. ADR (PDD), while KRBN tracks S&P Global Carbon Credit Index. Their fees differ too: 1.27% for KPDD and 0.90% for KRBN.

KRBN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.71 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KPDD and KRBN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer