KOOL vs. CNAV
KOOL (North Shore Equity Rotation ETF) and CNAV (Mohr Company Nav ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, KOOL returned 27.29% vs 56.50% for CNAV. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. KOOL charges 0.94%/yr vs 1.31%/yr for CNAV.
Performance
KOOL vs. CNAV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KOOL achieves a 12.06% return, which is significantly lower than CNAV's 34.15% return.
KOOL
- 1D
- -3.11%
- 1M
- -3.23%
- YTD
- 12.06%
- 6M
- 10.26%
- 1Y
- 27.29%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CNAV
- 1D
- -7.71%
- 1M
- 3.16%
- YTD
- 34.15%
- 6M
- 33.13%
- 1Y
- 56.50%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KOOL vs. CNAV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
KOOL North Shore Equity Rotation ETF | 12.06% | 16.05% | 2.98% |
CNAV Mohr Company Nav ETF | 34.15% | 16.80% | 6.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between KOOL and CNAV is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2024 | 0.82 |
The correlation between KOOL and CNAV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KOOL vs. CNAV — Risk / Return Rank
KOOL
CNAV
KOOL vs. CNAV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for North Shore Equity Rotation ETF (KOOL) and Mohr Company Nav ETF (CNAV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KOOL | CNAV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.38 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.82 | 4.38 | -0.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.52 | 18.41 | -2.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KOOL | CNAV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.06 | 2.16 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.07 | 1.29 | -0.22 |
Drawdowns
KOOL vs. CNAV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KOOL drawdown since its inception was -20.46%, smaller than the maximum CNAV drawdown of -30.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KOOL and CNAV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KOOL | CNAV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.46% | -30.06% | +9.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.18% | -12.97% | +5.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.70% | -8.90% | +5.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.51% | -5.42% | +2.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.76% | 3.08% | -1.32% |
Volatility
KOOL vs. CNAV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for North Shore Equity Rotation ETF (KOOL) is 4.63%, while Mohr Company Nav ETF (CNAV) has a volatility of 14.56%. This indicates that KOOL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNAV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KOOL | CNAV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.63% | 14.56% | -9.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.81% | 22.65% | -11.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.31% | 26.34% | -13.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.06% | 27.80% | -10.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.06% | 27.80% | -10.74% |
KOOL vs. CNAV - Expense Ratio Comparison
KOOL has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is lower than CNAV's 1.31% expense ratio.
Dividends
KOOL vs. CNAV - Dividend Comparison
KOOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, while CNAV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CNAV Mohr Company Nav ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KOOL North Shore Equity Rotation ETF | 0.36% | 0.37% | 0.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KOOL and CNAV have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CNAV has higher volatility (14.56%) compared to KOOL (4.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KOOL dropped -20.46% vs CNAV's -30.06%.
On 1-year performance, CNAV leads with 56.50% vs 27.29% for KOOL. On fees, KOOL is cheaper at 0.94% per year. On volatility, KOOL has been the lower-risk option at 4.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CNAV has performed better with a 56.50% return vs 27.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
KOOL is cheaper with a 0.94% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for CNAV.
KOOL has the higher dividend yield at 0.36%, compared with 0.00% for CNAV.
They also come from different issuers: North Shore and Mohr. Their fees differ too: 0.94% for KOOL and 1.31% for CNAV.
CNAV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KOOL and CNAV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer