PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KOOL vs. BLCR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KOOL vs. BLCR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in North Shore Equity Rotation ETF (KOOL) and Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KOOL achieves a 13.81% return, which is significantly lower than BLCR's 18.78% return.


KOOL

1D
0.32%
1M
-0.72%
YTD
13.81%
6M
13.28%
1Y
28.04%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BLCR

1D
-0.10%
1M
1.31%
YTD
18.78%
6M
18.51%
1Y
45.01%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KOOL vs. BLCR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
KOOL
North Shore Equity Rotation ETF
13.81%16.05%10.83%
BLCR
Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF
18.78%30.93%6.28%

Correlation

The correlation between KOOL and BLCR is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024

0.88

The correlation between KOOL and BLCR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

KOOL vs. BLCR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
KOOL
BLCR

Technology

25.5%
34.3%

Energy

13.5%
2.2%

Industrials

13.0%
13.7%

Healthcare

8.3%
7.6%

Communication Services

7.7%
14.6%

Financial Services

7.4%
12.5%

Consumer Cyclical

6.2%
11.1%

Basic Materials

6.1%
2.2%

Utilities

6.1%
1.6%

Consumer Defensive

3.7%

-

Real Estate

2.5%

-

Technology

KOOL
25.5%
BLCR
34.3%

Energy

KOOL
13.5%
BLCR
2.2%

Industrials

KOOL
13.0%
BLCR
13.7%

Healthcare

KOOL
8.3%
BLCR
7.6%

Communication Services

KOOL
7.7%
BLCR
14.6%

Financial Services

KOOL
7.4%
BLCR
12.5%

Consumer Cyclical

KOOL
6.2%
BLCR
11.1%

Basic Materials

KOOL
6.1%
BLCR
2.2%

Utilities

KOOL
6.1%
BLCR
1.6%

Consumer Defensive

KOOL
3.7%
BLCR

-

Real Estate

KOOL
2.5%
BLCR

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KOOL vs. BLCR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KOOL
KOOL Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
KOOL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KOOL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
KOOL Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
KOOL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
KOOL Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

BLCR
BLCR Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
BLCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLCR Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
BLCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLCR Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KOOL vs. BLCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for North Shore Equity Rotation ETF (KOOL) and Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KOOLBLCRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.47

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.92

4.41

-0.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.88

20.00

-5.12

KOOL vs. BLCR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KOOL Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is comparable to the BLCR Sharpe Ratio of 2.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KOOL and BLCR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KOOL vs. BLCR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KOOL drawdown since its inception was -20.46%, roughly equal to the maximum BLCR drawdown of -21.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KOOL and BLCR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KOOLBLCRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.46%

-21.29%

+0.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.18%

-10.26%

+3.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.20%

-1.02%

-1.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.52%

-2.19%

-0.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.89%

2.26%

-0.37%

Volatility

KOOL vs. BLCR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for North Shore Equity Rotation ETF (KOOL) is 5.11%, while Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR) has a volatility of 6.10%. This indicates that KOOL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BLCR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KOOLBLCRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.11%

6.10%

-0.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.06%

13.11%

-2.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.62%

16.38%

-2.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.06%

17.65%

-0.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.06%

17.65%

-0.59%

KOOL vs. BLCR - Expense Ratio Comparison

KOOL has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is higher than BLCR's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

KOOL vs. BLCR - Dividend Comparison

KOOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, more than BLCR's 0.28% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
BLCR
Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF
0.28%0.33%0.75%0.13%
KOOL
North Shore Equity Rotation ETF
0.35%0.37%0.56%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


KOOL and BLCR have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BLCR has higher volatility (6.10%) compared to KOOL (5.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KOOL dropped -20.46% vs BLCR's -21.29%.

On 1-year performance, BLCR leads with 45.01% vs 28.04% for KOOL. On fees, BLCR is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, KOOL has been the lower-risk option at 5.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BLCR has performed better with a 45.01% return vs 28.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BLCR is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.94% for KOOL.

KOOL has the higher dividend yield at 0.35%, compared with 0.28% for BLCR.

They also come from different issuers: North Shore and BlackRock. Their fees differ too: 0.94% for KOOL and 0.36% for BLCR.

BLCR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KOOL and BLCR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer