PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KOOL vs. BUFH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KOOL vs. BUFH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in North Shore Equity Rotation ETF (KOOL) and FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF (BUFH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KOOL achieves a 12.06% return, which is significantly higher than BUFH's 2.21% return.


KOOL

1D
-3.11%
1M
-3.23%
YTD
12.06%
6M
10.26%
1Y
27.29%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BUFH

1D
-0.26%
1M
0.26%
YTD
2.21%
6M
2.60%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KOOL vs. BUFH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
KOOL
North Shore Equity Rotation ETF
12.06%10.10%
BUFH
FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF
2.21%3.89%

Correlation

The correlation between KOOL and BUFH is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025

0.69

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KOOL vs. BUFH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KOOL
KOOL Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
KOOL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KOOL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
KOOL Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
KOOL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
KOOL Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

BUFH
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KOOL vs. BUFH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for North Shore Equity Rotation ETF (KOOL) and FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF (BUFH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KOOLBUFHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.52

KOOL vs. BUFH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KOOLBUFHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.07

2.76

-1.69

Drawdowns

KOOL vs. BUFH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KOOL drawdown since its inception was -20.46%, which is greater than BUFH's maximum drawdown of -1.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KOOL and BUFH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KOOLBUFHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.46%

-1.53%

-18.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.70%

-0.28%

-3.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.51%

-0.18%

-2.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.76%

Volatility

KOOL vs. BUFH - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KOOLBUFHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.31%

2.38%

+10.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.06%

2.38%

+14.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.06%

2.38%

+14.68%

KOOL vs. BUFH - Expense Ratio Comparison

KOOL has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFH's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

KOOL vs. BUFH - Dividend Comparison

KOOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, while BUFH has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
BUFH
FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%
KOOL
North Shore Equity Rotation ETF
0.36%0.37%0.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


KOOL and BUFH have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, KOOL is cheaper at 0.94% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

KOOL is cheaper with a 0.94% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BUFH.

KOOL has the higher dividend yield at 0.36%, compared with 0.00% for BUFH.

KOOL is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BUFH is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: North Shore and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.94% for KOOL and 0.95% for BUFH.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KOOL and BUFH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer