KONG vs. ONEH
KONG (Formidable Fortress ETF) and ONEH (TrueShares Equity Hedge ETF) are both Equity Hedged funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.06 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. KONG charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for ONEH.
Performance
KONG vs. ONEH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
KONG
- 1D
- 1.18%
- 1M
- 2.29%
- 6M
- 4.16%
- YTD
- 5.64%
- 1Y
- 7.92%
- 3Y*
- 8.47%
- 5Y*
- 5.52%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.71%
ONEH
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- 0.65%
- 6M
- -0.40%
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $14.69K | $9.34K | $25.25K | |
| $1.50M | $739.32K | $307.90K |
KONG vs. ONEH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
KONG Formidable Fortress ETF | 2.91% |
ONEH TrueShares Equity Hedge ETF | -0.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between KONG and ONEH is 0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2026 | 0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KONG vs. ONEH — Risk / Return Rank
KONG
ONEH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
KONG vs. ONEH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Formidable Fortress ETF (KONG) and TrueShares Equity Hedge ETF (ONEH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KONG | ONEH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.93 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.48 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KONG vs. ONEH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KONG drawdown since its inception was -19.98%, which is greater than ONEH's maximum drawdown of -3.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KONG and ONEH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KONG | ONEH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.98% | -3.55% | -16.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.54% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.48% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.34% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.80% | +0.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.68% | -1.50% | -4.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.28% | — | — |
Volatility
KONG vs. ONEH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KONG | ONEH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.44% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.01% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.20% | 5.06% | +6.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.92% | 5.06% | +8.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.50% | 5.06% | +9.44% |
KONG vs. ONEH - Expense Ratio Comparison
KONG has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than ONEH's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
KONG vs. ONEH - Dividend Comparison
KONG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, while ONEH has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KONG Formidable Fortress ETF | 0.35% | 0.37% | 0.78% | 0.69% | 0.49% | 0.12% |
ONEH TrueShares Equity Hedge ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KONG and ONEH have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ONEH is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ONEH is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for KONG.
KONG has the higher dividend yield at 0.35%, compared with 0.00% for ONEH.
They also come from different issuers: Formidable and TrueShares. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for KONG and 0.79% for ONEH.
Find the right allocation for KONG and ONEH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer