KOMP vs. QQJG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

KOMP (SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF) and QQJG (Invesco ESG NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds - KOMP tracks the S&P Kensho New Economies Composite Index while QQJG tracks the Nasdaq Next Generation 100 ESG Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, KOMP returned 21.79%/yr vs 14.09%/yr for QQJG. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.20% expense ratio.

Performance

KOMP vs. QQJG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF (KOMP) and Invesco ESG NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQJG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KOMP achieves a 23.59% return, which is significantly higher than QQJG's 1.44% return.

KOMP

• 1D: -2.06%
• 1M: 11.27%
• YTD: 23.59%
• 6M: 21.48%
• 1Y: 46.75%
• 3Y*: 21.79%
• 5Y*: 3.36%
• 10Y*: —

QQJG

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 1.44%
• 6M: 1.92%
• 1Y: 18.92%
• 3Y*: 14.09%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KOMP vs. QQJG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
KOMP SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF	23.59%	19.74%	10.05%	20.09%	-32.21%	-5.80%
QQJG Invesco ESG NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF	1.44%	18.05%	14.67%	17.20%	-27.69%	0.91%

Correlation

The correlation between KOMP and QQJG is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.64
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2021	0.86

Over the past year, the correlation between KOMP and QQJG has dropped to 0.64 - well below their long-term average of 0.86, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

KOMP vs. QQJG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	KOMP	QQJG
Technology	33.0%	44.5%
Industrials	28.2%	6.4%
Healthcare	11.6%	18.2%
Financial Services	5.8%	0.1%
Communication Services	5.6%	6.2%
Utilities	5.2%	-
Consumer Cyclical	4.7%	14.3%
Basic Materials	2.9%	2.5%
Energy	2.8%	1.6%
Consumer Defensive	0.2%	3.4%
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

KOMP vs. QQJG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KOMP

KOMP Risk / Return Rank: 57
KOMP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
KOMP Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
KOMP Omega Ratio Rank: 53
KOMP Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
KOMP Martin Ratio Rank: 56

QQJG

QQJG Risk / Return Rank: 45
QQJG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
QQJG Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
QQJG Omega Ratio Rank: 46
QQJG Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
QQJG Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KOMP vs. QQJG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF (KOMP) and Invesco ESG NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQJG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	KOMP	QQJG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.03	1.37	+0.66
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.67	1.97	+0.70
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.29	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.03	2.42	+0.61
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.86	8.87	+0.99
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

KOMP vs. QQJG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KOMP Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is higher than the QQJG Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KOMP and QQJG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KOMP	QQJG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.03	1.37	+0.66
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.14	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.52	0.17	+0.36

Drawdowns

KOMP vs. QQJG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KOMP drawdown since its inception was -50.06%, which is greater than QQJG's maximum drawdown of -36.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KOMP and QQJG.

Drawdown Indicators

	KOMP	QQJG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.06%	-36.76%	-13.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.50%	-7.93%	-7.57%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.93%	-23.48%	-1.45%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-45.38%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.06%	-2.09%	+0.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.69%	-15.32%	-6.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.75%	2.15%	+2.60%

Volatility

KOMP vs. QQJG - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF (KOMP) has a higher volatility of 7.43% compared to Invesco ESG NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQJG) at 0.00%. This indicates that KOMP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQJG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KOMP	QQJG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.43%	0.00%	+7.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.95%	8.32%	+9.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.15%	14.05%	+9.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.78%	21.70%	+3.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.02%	21.70%	+5.32%

KOMP vs. QQJG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both KOMP and QQJG have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

KOMP vs. QQJG - Dividend Comparison

KOMP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%, less than QQJG's 13.86% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
KOMP SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF	1.43%	1.84%	1.04%	1.27%	1.47%	1.44%	0.69%	0.81%	0.13%
QQJG Invesco ESG NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF	13.86%	0.68%	0.65%	0.54%	0.70%	0.08%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KOMP and QQJG in my portfolio?

KOMP and QQJG have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KOMP or QQJG?

KOMP has higher volatility (7.43%) compared to QQJG (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KOMP dropped -50.06% vs QQJG's -36.76%.

Which ETF is better, KOMP or QQJG?

On 3-year performance, KOMP leads with 21.79% vs 14.09% for QQJG. Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. On volatility, QQJG has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, KOMP or QQJG?

Over the 3-year period, KOMP has performed better with a 21.79% return vs 14.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, KOMP or QQJG?

KOMP and QQJG have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KOMP or QQJG?

QQJG has the higher dividend yield at 13.86%, compared with 1.43% for KOMP.

What is the main difference between KOMP and QQJG?

KOMP tracks S&P Kensho New Economies Composite Index, while QQJG tracks Nasdaq Next Generation 100 ESG Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

KOMP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.