KOMP vs. GLDM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

KOMP (SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF) and GLDM (SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - KOMP is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P Kensho New Economies Composite Index, while GLDM is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, KOMP returned 3.36%/yr vs 18.49%/yr for GLDM. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KOMP charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for GLDM.

Performance

KOMP vs. GLDM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF (KOMP) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KOMP achieves a 23.59% return, which is significantly higher than GLDM's 3.00% return.

KOMP

• 1D: -2.06%
• 1M: 11.27%
• YTD: 23.59%
• 6M: 21.48%
• 1Y: 46.75%
• 3Y*: 21.79%
• 5Y*: 3.36%
• 10Y*: —

GLDM

• 1D: -0.96%
• 1M: -1.62%
• YTD: 3.00%
• 6M: 5.60%
• 1Y: 32.42%
• 3Y*: 31.49%
• 5Y*: 18.49%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KOMP vs. GLDM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
KOMP SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF	23.59%	19.74%	10.05%	20.09%	-32.21%	3.67%	61.28%	37.12%	-10.32%
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust	3.00%	64.20%	27.08%	13.04%	-0.47%	-4.01%	25.10%	18.10%	4.23%

Correlation

The correlation between KOMP and GLDM is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.24
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.20
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.16
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2018	0.12

The correlation between KOMP and GLDM shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (all time) to 0.24 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

KOMP vs. GLDM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	KOMP	GLDM
Technology	33.0%	-
Industrials	28.2%	-
Healthcare	11.6%	-
Financial Services	5.8%	-
Communication Services	5.6%	-
Utilities	5.2%	-
Consumer Cyclical	4.7%	-
Basic Materials	2.9%	100.0%
Energy	2.8%	-
Consumer Defensive	0.2%	-
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

KOMP vs. GLDM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KOMP

KOMP Risk / Return Rank: 57
KOMP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
KOMP Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
KOMP Omega Ratio Rank: 53
KOMP Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
KOMP Martin Ratio Rank: 56

GLDM

GLDM Risk / Return Rank: 32
GLDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
GLDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
GLDM Omega Ratio Rank: 36
GLDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
GLDM Martin Ratio Rank: 29

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KOMP vs. GLDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF (KOMP) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	KOMP	GLDM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.03	1.24	+0.80
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.67	1.63	+1.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.25	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.03	1.70	+1.33
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.86	4.23	+5.63
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

KOMP vs. GLDM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KOMP Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is higher than the GLDM Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KOMP and GLDM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KOMP	GLDM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.03	1.24	+0.80
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.14	1.04	-0.90
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.52	1.02	-0.49

Drawdowns

KOMP vs. GLDM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KOMP drawdown since its inception was -50.06%, which is greater than GLDM's maximum drawdown of -21.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KOMP and GLDM.

Drawdown Indicators

	KOMP	GLDM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.06%	-21.63%	-28.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.50%	-19.14%	+3.64%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.93%	-19.14%	-5.79%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-45.38%	-20.92%	-24.46%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.06%	-17.65%	+15.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.69%	-6.22%	-15.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.75%	7.69%	-2.94%

Volatility

KOMP vs. GLDM - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF (KOMP) has a higher volatility of 7.43% compared to SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) at 5.47%. This indicates that KOMP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KOMP	GLDM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.43%	5.47%	+1.96%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.95%	22.99%	-5.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.15%	26.39%	-3.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.78%	17.91%	+6.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.02%	16.85%	+10.17%

KOMP vs. GLDM - Expense Ratio Comparison

KOMP has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than GLDM's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

KOMP vs. GLDM - Dividend Comparison

KOMP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%, while GLDM has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
KOMP SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF	1.43%	1.84%	1.04%	1.27%	1.47%	1.44%	0.69%	0.81%	0.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KOMP and GLDM in my portfolio?

KOMP and GLDM have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KOMP or GLDM?

KOMP has higher volatility (7.43%) compared to GLDM (5.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KOMP dropped -50.06% vs GLDM's -21.63%.

Which ETF is better, KOMP or GLDM?

On 5-year performance, GLDM leads with 18.49% vs 3.36% for KOMP. On fees, GLDM is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, GLDM has been the lower-risk option at 5.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, KOMP or GLDM?

Over the 5-year period, GLDM has performed better with a 18.49% return vs 3.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, KOMP or GLDM?

GLDM is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for KOMP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KOMP or GLDM?

KOMP has the higher dividend yield at 1.43%, compared with 0.00% for GLDM.

What is the main difference between KOMP and GLDM?

KOMP is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while GLDM is Gold. KOMP tracks S&P Kensho New Economies Composite Index, while GLDM tracks LBMA Gold Price PM. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for KOMP and 0.10% for GLDM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

KOMP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.