KOMP vs. CRTC

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

KOMP (State Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF) and CRTC (Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - KOMP tracks the S&P Kensho New Economies Composite Index while CRTC tracks the Solactive Whitney U.S. Critical Technologies Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, KOMP returned 21.97% vs 17.24% for CRTC. Their 0.80 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. KOMP charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for CRTC.

Performance

KOMP vs. CRTC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF (KOMP) and Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF (CRTC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KOMP achieves a 10.19% return, which is significantly higher than CRTC's 9.47% return.

KOMP

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: -5.47%
• 6M: 4.36%
• YTD: 10.19%
• 1Y: 21.97%
• 3Y*: 13.12%
• 5Y*: 2.00%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 12.11%

CRTC

• 1D: 2.36%
• 1M: 3.10%
• 6M: 7.08%
• YTD: 9.47%
• 1Y: 17.24%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 20.10%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CRTC Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF	$249.56K	$623.71K	$501.58K
KOMP State Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF	$3.68M	$4.72M	$6.88M

KOMP vs. CRTC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
KOMP State Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF	10.19%	19.74%	10.05%	15.16%
CRTC Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF	9.47%	18.69%	18.05%	7.16%

Correlation

The correlation between KOMP and CRTC is 0.80, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2023	0.80

The correlation between KOMP and CRTC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

KOMP vs. CRTC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	KOMP	CRTC
Technology	38.9%	39.6%
Industrials	25.7%	13.4%
Healthcare	12.9%	13.5%
Consumer Cyclical	6.0%	4.9%
Communication Services	4.2%	14.0%
Financial Services	4.0%	0.1%
Utilities	3.6%	5.5%
Basic Materials	3.0%	3.0%
Energy	1.3%	5.8%
Consumer Defensive	0.5%	0.0%
Real Estate	-	0.1%

Return for Risk

KOMP vs. CRTC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

KOMP

KOMP Risk / Return Rank: 33
KOMP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
KOMP Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
KOMP Omega Ratio Rank: 30
KOMP Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
KOMP Martin Ratio Rank: 34

CRTC

CRTC Risk / Return Rank: 47
CRTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
CRTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
CRTC Omega Ratio Rank: 44
CRTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
CRTC Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

KOMP vs. CRTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF (KOMP) and Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF (CRTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KOMP	CRTC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.76	1.24	-0.47
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.18	1.73	-0.55
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.22	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.27	1.91	-0.65
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.28	6.01	-2.73

KOMP vs. CRTC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KOMP Sharpe Ratio is 0.76, which is lower than the CRTC Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KOMP and CRTC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

KOMP vs. CRTC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KOMP drawdown since its inception was -50.06%, which is greater than CRTC's maximum drawdown of -19.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KOMP and CRTC.

Drawdown Indicators

	KOMP	CRTC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.06%	-19.07%	-30.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.57%	-9.05%	-6.52%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.93%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-45.38%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.68%	-0.47%	-12.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.42%	-2.23%	-19.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.01%	2.88%	+3.13%

Volatility

KOMP vs. CRTC - Volatility Comparison

State Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF (KOMP) has a higher volatility of 7.89% compared to Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF (CRTC) at 4.30%. This indicates that KOMP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KOMP	CRTC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.89%	4.30%	+3.59%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.56%	11.00%	+9.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.79%	14.04%	+11.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.22%	15.82%	+9.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.12%	15.82%	+11.30%

KOMP vs. CRTC - Expense Ratio Comparison

KOMP has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than CRTC's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

KOMP vs. CRTC - Dividend Comparison

KOMP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, more than CRTC's 0.87% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
CRTC Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF	0.87%	1.03%	1.13%	0.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
KOMP State Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF	1.58%	1.84%	1.04%	1.27%	1.47%	1.44%	0.69%	0.81%	0.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KOMP and CRTC in my portfolio?

KOMP and CRTC have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KOMP or CRTC?

KOMP has higher volatility (7.89%) compared to CRTC (4.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KOMP dropped -50.06% vs CRTC's -19.07%.

Which ETF is better, KOMP or CRTC?

On 1-year performance, KOMP leads with 21.97% vs 17.24% for CRTC. On fees, KOMP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, CRTC has been the lower-risk option at 4.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, KOMP or CRTC?

Over the 1-year period, KOMP has performed better with a 21.97% return vs 17.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, KOMP or CRTC?

KOMP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for CRTC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KOMP or CRTC?

KOMP has the higher dividend yield at 1.58%, compared with 0.87% for CRTC.

What is the main difference between KOMP and CRTC?

KOMP tracks S&P Kensho New Economies Composite Index, while CRTC tracks Solactive Whitney U.S. Critical Technologies Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for KOMP and 0.35% for CRTC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CRTC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.24 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.