PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KOKU vs. QARP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KOKU vs. QARP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Kokusai Equity ETF (KOKU) and Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KOKU achieves a 8.81% return, which is significantly lower than QARP's 12.07% return.


KOKU

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.31%
6M
6.98%
YTD
8.81%
1Y
18.86%
3Y*
18.33%
5Y*
11.77%
10Y*

QARP

1D
-0.63%
1M
2.08%
6M
9.01%
YTD
12.07%
1Y
23.49%
3Y*
16.84%
5Y*
11.95%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KOKU vs. QARP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
KOKU
Xtrackers MSCI Kokusai Equity ETF
8.81%21.45%19.45%24.23%-17.83%23.84%42.72%
QARP
Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF
12.07%13.99%18.94%23.03%-14.62%31.82%41.80%

Correlation

The correlation between KOKU and QARP is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2020

0.89

The correlation between KOKU and QARP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

KOKU vs. QARP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
KOKU
QARP

Technology

31.8%
23.5%

Financial Services

14.9%
12.1%

Industrials

10.1%
8.5%

Consumer Cyclical

9.0%
9.6%

Communication Services

8.9%
11.3%

Healthcare

8.8%
13.9%

Consumer Defensive

5.0%
9.6%

Energy

4.0%
5.8%

Basic Materials

3.3%
2.3%

Utilities

2.6%
2.0%

Real Estate

1.7%
1.0%

Technology

KOKU
31.8%
QARP
23.5%

Financial Services

KOKU
14.9%
QARP
12.1%

Industrials

KOKU
10.1%
QARP
8.5%

Consumer Cyclical

KOKU
9.0%
QARP
9.6%

Communication Services

KOKU
8.9%
QARP
11.3%

Healthcare

KOKU
8.8%
QARP
13.9%

Consumer Defensive

KOKU
5.0%
QARP
9.6%

Energy

KOKU
4.0%
QARP
5.8%

Basic Materials

KOKU
3.3%
QARP
2.3%

Utilities

KOKU
2.6%
QARP
2.0%

Real Estate

KOKU
1.7%
QARP
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KOKU vs. QARP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KOKU
KOKU Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
KOKU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KOKU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
KOKU Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
KOKU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
KOKU Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

QARP
QARP Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
QARP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QARP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
QARP Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
QARP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
QARP Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KOKU vs. QARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Kokusai Equity ETF (KOKU) and Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KOKUQARPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.40

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.09

3.25

-1.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.92

14.45

-5.53

KOKU vs. QARP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KOKU Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is lower than the QARP Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KOKU and QARP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KOKU vs. QARP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KOKU drawdown since its inception was -25.77%, smaller than the maximum QARP drawdown of -35.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KOKU and QARP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KOKUQARPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.77%

-35.44%

+9.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.04%

-7.26%

-1.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.73%

-15.65%

-2.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.77%

-22.75%

-3.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.62%

-0.63%

-0.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.77%

-4.39%

-0.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.12%

1.63%

+0.49%

Volatility

KOKU vs. QARP - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI Kokusai Equity ETF (KOKU) and Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP) have volatilities of 2.81% and 2.84%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KOKUQARPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.81%

2.84%

-0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.23%

8.25%

+1.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.50%

10.60%

+1.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.49%

15.54%

+0.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.76%

19.55%

-2.79%

KOKU vs. QARP - Expense Ratio Comparison

KOKU has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than QARP's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

KOKU vs. QARP - Dividend Comparison

KOKU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, more than QARP's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
KOKU
Xtrackers MSCI Kokusai Equity ETF
1.44%1.48%1.63%1.76%1.98%1.89%0.55%0.00%0.00%
QARP
Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF
1.03%1.14%1.39%1.28%1.68%1.34%1.61%1.85%1.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


KOKU and QARP have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QARP has higher volatility (2.84%) compared to KOKU (2.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KOKU dropped -25.77% vs QARP's -35.44%.

On 5-year performance, QARP leads with 11.95% vs 11.77% for KOKU. On fees, KOKU is cheaper at 0.09% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QARP has performed better with a 11.95% return vs 11.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

KOKU is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for QARP.

KOKU has the higher dividend yield at 1.44%, compared with 1.03% for QARP.

KOKU tracks MSCI Kokusai Index (World ex Japan), while QARP tracks Russell 1000 2Qual/Val 5% Capped Factor Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for KOKU and 0.19% for QARP.

QARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KOKU and QARP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer