KOID vs. KLIP

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

KOID (KraneShares Global Humanoid Robotics and Physical AI Index ETF) and KLIP (KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KOID is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MerQube Global Humanoid Robotics and Physical AI Index, while KLIP is a China Equities fund actively managed by KraneShares. KOID is passively managed, while KLIP is actively managed. Over the past year, KOID returned 42.44% vs -3.11% for KLIP. Their 0.43 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. KOID charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for KLIP.

Performance

KOID vs. KLIP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares Global Humanoid Robotics and Physical AI Index ETF (KOID) and KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KOID achieves a 17.78% return, which is significantly higher than KLIP's -6.77% return.

KOID

• 1D: 2.51%
• 1M: -6.76%
• 6M: 11.54%
• YTD: 17.78%
• 1Y: 42.44%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 41.50%

KLIP

• 1D: 0.35%
• 1M: 6.88%
• 6M: -11.18%
• YTD: -6.77%
• 1Y: -3.11%
• 3Y*: 6.33%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 6.52%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
KLIP KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF	$647.66K	$581.47K	$1.00M
KOID KraneShares Global Humanoid Robotics and Physical AI Index ETF	$4.83M	$7.02M	$7.52M

KOID vs. KLIP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
KOID KraneShares Global Humanoid Robotics and Physical AI Index ETF	17.78%	27.04%
KLIP KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF	-6.77%	8.80%

Correlation

The correlation between KOID and KLIP is 0.43, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.43
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025	0.43

KOID vs. KLIP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	KOID	KLIP
Technology	43.5%	4.2%
Industrials	37.0%	-
Consumer Cyclical	14.8%	34.2%
Basic Materials	4.8%	-
Communication Services	-	45.8%
Consumer Defensive	-	4.0%
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	2.0%
Healthcare	-	6.0%
Real Estate	-	3.9%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

KOID vs. KLIP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

KOID

KOID Risk / Return Rank: 57
KOID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
KOID Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
KOID Omega Ratio Rank: 56
KOID Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
KOID Martin Ratio Rank: 51

KLIP

KLIP Risk / Return Rank: 8
KLIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
KLIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
KLIP Omega Ratio Rank: 8
KLIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
KLIP Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

KOID vs. KLIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Global Humanoid Robotics and Physical AI Index ETF (KOID) and KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KOID	KLIP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.49	-0.19	+1.68
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.07	-0.15	+2.22
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	0.98	+0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.17	-0.15	+2.32
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.23	-0.34	+6.57

KOID vs. KLIP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KOID Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is higher than the KLIP Sharpe Ratio of -0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KOID and KLIP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

KOID vs. KLIP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KOID drawdown since its inception was -19.63%, smaller than the maximum KLIP drawdown of -21.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KOID and KLIP.

Drawdown Indicators

	KOID	KLIP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.63%	-21.48%	+1.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.63%	-21.48%	+1.85%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-21.48%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.29%	-12.12%	-1.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.20%	-4.33%	+0.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.83%	9.22%	-2.39%

Volatility

KOID vs. KLIP - Volatility Comparison

KraneShares Global Humanoid Robotics and Physical AI Index ETF (KOID) has a higher volatility of 11.38% compared to KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP) at 2.37%. This indicates that KOID's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KLIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KOID	KLIP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.38%	2.37%	+9.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.11%	12.99%	+11.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.61%	16.60%	+12.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.40%	17.98%	+9.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.40%	17.98%	+9.42%

KOID vs. KLIP - Expense Ratio Comparison

KOID has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than KLIP's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

KOID vs. KLIP - Dividend Comparison

KOID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%, less than KLIP's 27.54% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
KLIP KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF	27.54%	25.14%	54.26%	61.22%
KOID KraneShares Global Humanoid Robotics and Physical AI Index ETF	0.72%	0.85%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KOID and KLIP in my portfolio?

KOID and KLIP have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KOID or KLIP?

KOID has higher volatility (11.38%) compared to KLIP (2.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KOID dropped -19.63% vs KLIP's -21.48%.

Which ETF is better, KOID or KLIP?

On 1-year performance, KOID leads with 42.44% vs -3.11% for KLIP. On fees, KOID is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, KLIP has been the lower-risk option at 2.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, KOID or KLIP?

Over the 1-year period, KOID has performed better with a 42.44% return vs -3.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, KOID or KLIP?

KOID is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for KLIP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KOID or KLIP?

KLIP has the higher dividend yield at 27.54%, compared with 0.72% for KOID.

What is the main difference between KOID and KLIP?

KOID is categorized as Technology Equities, while KLIP is China Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for KOID and 0.95% for KLIP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

KOID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs -0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.