PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KO vs. CI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

KO vs. CI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Coca-Cola Company (KO) and Cigna Corporation (CI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KO achieves a 14.47% return, which is significantly higher than CI's 6.37% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with KO having a 9.15% annualized return and CI not far ahead at 9.53%.


KO

1D
3.46%
1M
0.32%
YTD
14.47%
6M
14.32%
1Y
15.33%
3Y*
12.95%
5Y*
10.40%
10Y*
9.15%

CI

1D
3.14%
1M
3.25%
YTD
6.37%
6M
10.29%
1Y
-4.86%
3Y*
5.21%
5Y*
4.73%
10Y*
9.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KO vs. CI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
14.47%15.60%8.88%-4.43%10.61%11.37%2.47%20.60%6.77%14.38%
CI
Cigna Corporation
6.37%1.72%-6.27%-7.97%46.68%12.29%1.83%7.70%-6.46%52.29%

Correlation

The correlation between KO and CI is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 1982

0.30

The correlation between KO and CI shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (1 year) to 0.34 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

KO:

$342.88B

CI:

$76.43B

EPS

KO:

$3.18

CI:

$23.59

PE Ratio

KO:

25.02

CI:

12.27

PEG Ratio

KO:

3.02

CI:

0.71

PS Ratio

KO:

6.96

CI:

0.28

PB Ratio

KO:

10.19

CI:

1.81

Total Revenue (TTM)

KO:

$49.28B

CI:

$277.94B

Gross Profit (TTM)

KO:

$30.43B

CI:

$19.38B

EBITDA (TTM)

KO:

$18.35B

CI:

$10.03B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KO vs. CI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KO
KO Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
KO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
KO Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
KO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
KO Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

CI
CI Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
CI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
CI Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
CI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
CI Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KO vs. CI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Coca-Cola Company (KO) and Cigna Corporation (CI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KOCIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.00

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.95

-0.18

+2.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.82

-0.34

+4.15

KO vs. CI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KO Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is higher than the CI Sharpe Ratio of -0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KO and CI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KOCIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

-0.15

+1.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.17

+0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.31

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.34

+0.19

Drawdowns

KO vs. CI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KO drawdown since its inception was -68.23%, smaller than the maximum CI drawdown of -84.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KO and CI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KOCIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.23%

-84.34%

+16.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.89%

-26.54%

+18.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.26%

-32.10%

+15.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.27%

-32.10%

+14.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.99%

-42.47%

+5.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.98%

-18.21%

+15.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.09%

-18.82%

+2.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.03%

14.51%

-10.48%

Volatility

KO vs. CI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is 5.91%, while Cigna Corporation (CI) has a volatility of 9.35%. This indicates that KO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KOCIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.91%

9.35%

-3.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.38%

18.86%

-6.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.37%

33.18%

-16.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.10%

28.43%

-12.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.20%

30.75%

-12.55%

Dividends

KO vs. CI - Dividend Comparison

KO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%, more than CI's 2.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CI
Cigna Corporation
2.12%2.19%2.03%1.64%1.35%1.74%0.02%0.02%0.02%0.02%0.03%0.03%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
2.59%2.92%3.12%3.12%2.77%2.84%2.99%2.89%3.29%3.23%3.38%3.07%

Financials

KO vs. CI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Coca-Cola Company and Cigna Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


10.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B50.00B60.00B70.00B20222023202420252026
12.47B
68.49B
(KO) Total Revenue
(CI) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

KO vs. CI - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between The Coca-Cola Company and Cigna Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
63.0%
0
Portfolio components
KO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Coca-Cola Company reported a gross profit of 7.85B and revenue of 12.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.0%.

CI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cigna Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 68.49B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

KO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Coca-Cola Company reported an operating income of 4.36B and revenue of 12.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 35.0%.

CI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cigna Corporation reported an operating income of 2.36B and revenue of 68.49B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.4%.

KO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Coca-Cola Company reported a net income of 3.92B and revenue of 12.47B, resulting in a net margin of 31.5%.

CI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cigna Corporation reported a net income of 1.65B and revenue of 68.49B, resulting in a net margin of 2.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


KO and CI have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CI has higher volatility (9.35%) compared to KO (5.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KO dropped -68.23% vs CI's -84.34%.

KO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.94 vs -0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KO and CI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer