KO vs. BMI
KO (The Coca-Cola Company) and BMI (Badger Meter, Inc.) are both stocks. KO operates in Beverages - Non-Alcoholic (Consumer Defensive), while BMI operates in Electrical Equipment & Parts (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, KO returned 9.46%/yr vs 15.34%/yr for BMI. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
KO vs. BMI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KO achieves a 17.28% return, which is significantly higher than BMI's -22.48% return. Over the past 10 years, KO has underperformed BMI with an annualized return of 9.46%, while BMI has yielded a comparatively higher 15.34% annualized return.
KO
- 1D
- -1.44%
- 1M
- 0.76%
- YTD
- 17.28%
- 6M
- 15.53%
- 1Y
- 17.15%
- 3Y*
- 12.74%
- 5Y*
- 11.40%
- 10Y*
- 9.46%
BMI
- 1D
- 2.03%
- 1M
- 18.05%
- YTD
- -22.48%
- 6M
- -26.34%
- 1Y
- -44.05%
- 3Y*
- -2.73%
- 5Y*
- 7.71%
- 10Y*
- 15.34%
KO vs. BMI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KO The Coca-Cola Company | 17.28% | 15.60% | 8.88% | -4.43% | 10.61% | 11.37% | 2.47% | 20.60% | 6.77% | 14.38% |
BMI Badger Meter, Inc. | -22.48% | -17.15% | 38.28% | 42.58% | 3.23% | 14.11% | 46.37% | 33.46% | 4.09% | 30.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between KO and BMI is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 1984 | 0.16 |
The correlation between KO and BMI shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.24 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
KO:
$349.05B
BMI:
$3.95B
KO:
$3.18
BMI:
$4.42
KO:
25.47
BMI:
30.38
KO:
3.07
BMI:
1.27
KO:
7.08
BMI:
4.42
KO:
10.38
BMI:
4.07
KO:
$49.28B
BMI:
$896.73M
KO:
$30.43B
BMI:
$370.96M
KO:
$18.35B
BMI:
$199.34M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KO vs. BMI — Risk / Return Rank
KO
BMI
KO vs. BMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Coca-Cola Company (KO) and Badger Meter, Inc. (BMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KO | BMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 0.80 | +0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.19 | -0.82 | +3.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.38 | -1.33 | +5.71 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KO vs. BMI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KO drawdown since its inception was -68.23%, roughly equal to the maximum BMI drawdown of -68.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KO and BMI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KO | BMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.23% | -68.22% | -0.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.87% | -53.79% | +45.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.26% | -55.06% | +38.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.27% | -55.06% | +37.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.99% | -55.06% | +18.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.58% | -46.57% | +43.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.09% | -19.03% | +2.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.93% | 33.17% | -29.24% |
Volatility
KO vs. BMI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is 6.89%, while Badger Meter, Inc. (BMI) has a volatility of 9.60%. This indicates that KO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KO | BMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.89% | 9.60% | -2.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.85% | 38.63% | -25.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.80% | 44.31% | -27.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.20% | 33.91% | -17.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.25% | 33.69% | -15.44% |
Dividends
KO vs. BMI - Dividend Comparison
KO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%, more than BMI's 1.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BMI Badger Meter, Inc. | 1.19% | 0.85% | 0.58% | 0.64% | 0.78% | 0.71% | 0.74% | 0.99% | 1.14% | 1.03% | 1.16% | 1.33% |
KO The Coca-Cola Company | 2.57% | 2.92% | 3.12% | 3.12% | 2.77% | 2.84% | 2.99% | 2.89% | 3.29% | 3.23% | 3.38% | 3.07% |
Financials
KO vs. BMI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Coca-Cola Company and Badger Meter, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
KO vs. BMI - Profitability Comparison
KO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Coca-Cola Company reported a gross profit of 7.85B and revenue of 12.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.0%.
BMI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Badger Meter, Inc. reported a gross profit of 84.33M and revenue of 202.28M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 41.7%.
KO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Coca-Cola Company reported an operating income of 4.36B and revenue of 12.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 35.0%.
BMI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Badger Meter, Inc. reported an operating income of 35.17M and revenue of 202.28M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.4%.
KO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Coca-Cola Company reported a net income of 3.92B and revenue of 12.47B, resulting in a net margin of 31.5%.
BMI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Badger Meter, Inc. reported a net income of 27.34M and revenue of 202.28M, resulting in a net margin of 13.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
KO and BMI have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BMI has higher volatility (9.60%) compared to KO (6.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KO dropped -68.23% vs BMI's -68.22%.
KO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.03 vs -1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KO and BMI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer