PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KNT.TO vs. POU.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

KNT.TO vs. POU.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in K92 Mining Inc. (KNT.TO) and Paramount Resources Ltd. (POU.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KNT.TO achieves a -0.18% return, which is significantly lower than POU.TO's 23.00% return. Over the past 10 years, KNT.TO has outperformed POU.TO with an annualized return of 35.57%, while POU.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 17.14% annualized return.


KNT.TO

1D
1.34%
1M
-12.82%
YTD
-0.18%
6M
2.86%
1Y
40.42%
3Y*
56.58%
5Y*
20.92%
10Y*
35.57%

POU.TO

1D
-1.01%
1M
-8.05%
YTD
23.00%
6M
18.31%
1Y
37.47%
3Y*
4.30%
5Y*
21.00%
10Y*
17.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KNT.TO vs. POU.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KNT.TO
K92 Mining Inc.
-0.18%161.41%33.33%-15.12%6.68%-5.52%164.24%242.86%55.56%-44.33%
POU.TO
Paramount Resources Ltd.
23.00%-21.48%30.17%-4.83%21.05%396.81%-33.69%5.01%-63.03%22.39%

Correlation

The correlation between KNT.TO and POU.TO is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 10, 2011

0.09

The correlation between KNT.TO and POU.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.19 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

KNT.TO:

CA$5.60B

POU.TO:

CA$4.35B

EPS

KNT.TO:

$1.28

POU.TO:

CA$0.37

PE Ratio

KNT.TO:

12.69

POU.TO:

80.47

PEG Ratio

KNT.TO:

0.13

POU.TO:

0.80

PS Ratio

KNT.TO:

5.84

POU.TO:

4.74

PB Ratio

KNT.TO:

4.51

POU.TO:

1.58

Total Revenue (TTM)

KNT.TO:

$685.77M

POU.TO:

CA$902.30M

Gross Profit (TTM)

KNT.TO:

$495.11M

POU.TO:

CA$181.10M

EBITDA (TTM)

KNT.TO:

$499.16M

POU.TO:

CA$329.30M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KNT.TO vs. POU.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KNT.TO
KNT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
KNT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KNT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
KNT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
KNT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
KNT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

POU.TO
POU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
POU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
POU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
POU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
POU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
POU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KNT.TO vs. POU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for K92 Mining Inc. (KNT.TO) and Paramount Resources Ltd. (POU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KNT.TOPOU.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.25

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.12

2.27

-1.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.89

5.78

-2.88

KNT.TO vs. POU.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KNT.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is lower than the POU.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KNT.TO and POU.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KNT.TO vs. POU.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KNT.TO drawdown since its inception was -90.67%, smaller than the maximum POU.TO drawdown of -98.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KNT.TO and POU.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KNT.TOPOU.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.67%

-98.31%

+7.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.35%

-18.11%

-20.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.35%

-53.34%

+14.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-54.53%

-56.46%

+1.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.47%

-96.12%

+15.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.72%

-37.16%

+5.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.61%

-54.12%

+11.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.88%

7.11%

+7.77%

Volatility

KNT.TO vs. POU.TO - Volatility Comparison

K92 Mining Inc. (KNT.TO) has a higher volatility of 18.12% compared to Paramount Resources Ltd. (POU.TO) at 10.34%. This indicates that KNT.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than POU.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KNT.TOPOU.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.12%

10.34%

+7.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.76%

24.14%

+15.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.55%

30.56%

+19.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

49.19%

45.18%

+4.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

58.20%

57.44%

+0.76%

Dividends

KNT.TO vs. POU.TO - Dividend Comparison

KNT.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while POU.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
KNT.TO
K92 Mining Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
POU.TO
Paramount Resources Ltd.
2.04%2.89%5.34%5.78%3.95%0.81%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.19%

Financials

KNT.TO vs. POU.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between K92 Mining Inc. and Paramount Resources Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M20222023202420252026
232.41M
280.40M
(KNT.TO) Total Revenue
(POU.TO) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. KNT.TO values in USD, POU.TO values in CAD

KNT.TO vs. POU.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between K92 Mining Inc. and Paramount Resources Ltd. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
73.5%
21.4%
Portfolio components
KNT.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, K92 Mining Inc. reported a gross profit of 170.77M and revenue of 232.41M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 73.5%.

POU.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Paramount Resources Ltd. reported a gross profit of 60.10M and revenue of 280.40M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.4%.

KNT.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, K92 Mining Inc. reported an operating income of 165.19M and revenue of 232.41M, resulting in an operating margin of 71.1%.

POU.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Paramount Resources Ltd. reported an operating income of 40.10M and revenue of 280.40M, resulting in an operating margin of 14.3%.

KNT.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, K92 Mining Inc. reported a net income of 114.72M and revenue of 232.41M, resulting in a net margin of 49.4%.

POU.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Paramount Resources Ltd. reported a net income of 53.20M and revenue of 280.40M, resulting in a net margin of 19.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


KNT.TO and POU.TO have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KNT.TO and POU.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer