KNT.TO vs. IMG.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about K92 Mining Inc. (KNT.TO) and IAMGOLD Corporation (IMG.TO).

Performance

KNT.TO vs. IMG.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in K92 Mining Inc. (KNT.TO) and IAMGOLD Corporation (IMG.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

KNT.TO vs. IMG.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
KNT.TO K92 Mining Inc.	4.05%	161.41%	33.33%	-15.12%	6.68%	-5.52%	164.24%	242.86%	55.56%	-44.33%
IMG.TO IAMGOLD Corporation	15.50%	204.85%	122.46%	-3.75%	-11.93%	-15.63%	-3.71%	-3.19%	-31.65%	41.23%

Fundamentals

Market Cap KNT.TO : CA$5.91B IMG.TO : CA$15.20B
EPS KNT.TO : CA$1.10 IMG.TO : CA$1.15
PE Ratio KNT.TO : 21.53 IMG.TO : 22.66
PEG Ratio KNT.TO : 0.22 IMG.TO : 0.12
PS Ratio KNT.TO : 9.77 IMG.TO : 5.30
PB Ratio KNT.TO : 7.71 IMG.TO : 3.63
Total Revenue (TTM) KNT.TO : CA$597.97M IMG.TO : CA$2.87B
Gross Profit (TTM) KNT.TO : CA$434.80M IMG.TO : CA$1.21B
EBITDA (TTM) KNT.TO : CA$430.99M IMG.TO : CA$1.51B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KNT.TO achieves a 4.05% return, which is significantly lower than IMG.TO's 15.50% return. Over the past 10 years, KNT.TO has outperformed IMG.TO with an annualized return of 44.38%, while IMG.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 24.43% annualized return.

KNT.TO

• 1D: 5.78%
• 1M: -28.19%
• YTD: 4.05%
• 6M: 40.37%
• 1Y: 90.25%
• 3Y*: 45.40%
• 5Y*: 28.38%
• 10Y*: 44.38%

IMG.TO

• 1D: 7.26%
• 1M: -22.05%
• YTD: 15.50%
• 6M: 45.49%
• 1Y: 191.31%
• 3Y*: 92.10%
• 5Y*: 46.03%
• 10Y*: 24.43%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

KNT.TO vs. IMG.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KNT.TO

KNT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 86
KNT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
KNT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
KNT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 84
KNT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
KNT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 89

IMG.TO

IMG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 94
IMG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
IMG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
IMG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 92
IMG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
IMG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KNT.TO vs. IMG.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for K92 Mining Inc. (KNT.TO) and IAMGOLD Corporation (IMG.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	KNT.TO	IMG.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.91	3.19	-1.29
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.23	3.13	-0.90
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.43	-0.11
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.53	5.57	-3.05
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.79	16.49	-6.70
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

KNT.TO vs. IMG.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KNT.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is lower than the IMG.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KNT.TO and IMG.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KNT.TO	IMG.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.91	3.19	-1.29
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.59	0.81	-0.22
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.72	0.43	+0.29
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.44	0.10	+0.34

Correlation

The correlation between KNT.TO and IMG.TO is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

KNT.TO vs. IMG.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither KNT.TO nor IMG.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

KNT.TO vs. IMG.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KNT.TO drawdown since its inception was -82.00%, smaller than the maximum IMG.TO drawdown of -93.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KNT.TO and IMG.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	KNT.TO	IMG.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-82.00%	-93.92%	+11.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-38.35%	-34.15%	-4.20%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-54.53%	-71.43%	+16.90%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-80.47%	-84.65%	+4.18%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-28.82%	-22.05%	-6.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-36.52%	-50.78%	+14.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.90%	11.55%	-1.65%

Volatility

KNT.TO vs. IMG.TO - Volatility Comparison

K92 Mining Inc. (KNT.TO) has a higher volatility of 21.13% compared to IAMGOLD Corporation (IMG.TO) at 19.92%. This indicates that KNT.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IMG.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KNT.TO	IMG.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	21.13%	19.92%	+1.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	40.41%	46.53%	-6.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	47.63%	60.28%	-12.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	48.58%	57.07%	-8.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	61.96%	56.78%	+5.18%

Financials

KNT.TO vs. IMG.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between K92 Mining Inc. and IAMGOLD Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

KNT.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, K92 Mining Inc. reported a gross profit of 126.61M and revenue of 179.47M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 70.6%.

IMG.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, IAMGOLD Corporation reported a gross profit of 595.72M and revenue of 1.10B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 53.9%.

KNT.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, K92 Mining Inc. reported an operating income of 122.01M and revenue of 179.47M, resulting in an operating margin of 68.0%.

IMG.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, IAMGOLD Corporation reported an operating income of 576.53M and revenue of 1.10B, resulting in an operating margin of 52.2%.

KNT.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, K92 Mining Inc. reported a net income of 76.24M and revenue of 179.47M, resulting in a net margin of 42.5%.

IMG.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, IAMGOLD Corporation reported a net income of 412.85M and revenue of 1.10B, resulting in a net margin of 37.4%.