PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
KNGC.TO vs. QQC-F.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

KNGC.TO vs. QQC-F.TO

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Brompton Canadian Cash Flow Kings ETF (KNGC.TO) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC-F.TO).

KNGC.TO and QQC-F.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. KNGC.TO is a passively managed fund by Brompton that tracks the performance of the Brompton Index One Canadian Cash Flow Kings Index. It was launched on May 30, 2024. QQC-F.TO is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on May 27, 2021. Both KNGC.TO and QQC-F.TO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

KNGC.TO vs. QQC-F.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Brompton Canadian Cash Flow Kings ETF (KNGC.TO) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC-F.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

KNGC.TO vs. QQC-F.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024
KNGC.TO
Brompton Canadian Cash Flow Kings ETF		17.17%41.07%110,085.50%
QQC-F.TO
Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged		-5.48%18.41%12.40%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KNGC.TO achieves a 17.17% return, which is significantly higher than QQC-F.TO's -5.48% return.

KNGC.TO

1D
-0.23%
1M
0.80%
YTD
17.17%
6M
25.90%
1Y
64.31%
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

QQC-F.TO

1D
1.03%
1M
-4.11%
YTD
-5.48%
6M
-4.18%
1Y
21.25%
3Y*
20.89%
5Y*
11.67%
10Y*
17.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Brompton Canadian Cash Flow Kings ETF

Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged

Often compared with KNGC.TO:
KNGC.TO vs. DMEC.TOKNGC.TO vs. ETSX.TOKNGC.TO vs. TQCD.TOKNGC.TO vs. FCCM.NEOKNGC.TO vs. FXM.TOKNGC.TO vs. TULV.TOKNGC.TO vs. XCSR.TO
Often compared with QQC-F.TO:
QQC-F.TO vs. QQC.TOQQC-F.TO vs. QQQQQC-F.TO vs. XEQT.TOQQC-F.TO vs. HXQ.TOQQC-F.TO vs. QQQMQQC-F.TO vs. XQQ.TOQQC-F.TO vs. MON100.NS

KNGC.TO vs. QQC-F.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

KNGC.TO has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than QQC-F.TO's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

QQC-F.TO
Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged
KNGC.TO
Brompton Canadian Cash Flow Kings ETF

Return for Risk

KNGC.TO vs. QQC-F.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
KNGC.TO
KNGC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
KNGC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KNGC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
KNGC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
KNGC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
KNGC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
QQC-F.TO
QQC-F.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
QQC-F.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQC-F.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQC-F.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
QQC-F.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQC-F.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KNGC.TO vs. QQC-F.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brompton Canadian Cash Flow Kings ETF (KNGC.TO) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC-F.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

KNGC.TOQQC-F.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

4.09

0.96

+3.13

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.74

1.52

+3.23

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.88

1.21

+0.67

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.43

1.68

+3.75

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

28.53

5.88

+22.65

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

KNGC.TO vs. QQC-F.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KNGC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 4.09, which is higher than the QQC-F.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KNGC.TO and QQC-F.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

KNGC.TOQQC-F.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.09

0.96

+3.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

—

0.52

—

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.78

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.08

0.84

-0.76

Correlation

The correlation between KNGC.TO and QQC-F.TO is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

KNGC.TO vs. QQC-F.TO - Dividend Comparison

KNGC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, while QQC-F.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KNGC.TO
Brompton Canadian Cash Flow Kings ETF		1.64%1.69%0.73%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQC-F.TO
Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged		0.00%0.09%0.50%0.57%0.89%0.66%0.49%0.64%0.77%0.66%0.81%0.76%

Drawdowns

KNGC.TO vs. QQC-F.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KNGC.TO drawdown since its inception was -20.25%, smaller than the maximum QQC-F.TO drawdown of -36.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KNGC.TO and QQC-F.TO.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

KNGC.TOQQC-F.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.25%

-36.03%

+15.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.79%

-13.16%

+1.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-36.03%

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-36.03%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.23%

-9.00%

+8.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.29%

-5.55%

+2.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.24%

3.76%

-1.52%

Volatility

KNGC.TO vs. QQC-F.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Brompton Canadian Cash Flow Kings ETF (KNGC.TO) is 2.78%, while Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC-F.TO) has a volatility of 6.70%. This indicates that KNGC.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQC-F.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

KNGC.TOQQC-F.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.78%

6.70%

-3.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.97%

12.87%

-2.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.82%

22.30%

-6.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

80,119.00%

22.47%

+80,096.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

80,119.00%

22.49%

+80,096.51%