KNCT vs. STHH

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

KNCT (Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF) and STHH (STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged) are both Technology Equities funds - KNCT tracks the STOXX World AC NexGen Connectivity Index while STHH tracks the STMicroelectronics NV Local Shares Total Return. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, KNCT returned 99.38% vs 209.77% for STHH. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. KNCT charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for STHH.

Performance

KNCT vs. STHH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF (KNCT) and STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged (STHH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KNCT achieves a 63.41% return, which is significantly lower than STHH's 209.56% return.

KNCT

• 1D: -0.63%
• 1M: 26.38%
• YTD: 63.41%
• 6M: 62.53%
• 1Y: 99.38%
• 3Y*: 43.36%
• 5Y*: 21.73%
• 10Y*: 21.42%

STHH

• 1D: 0.46%
• 1M: 45.30%
• YTD: 209.56%
• 6M: 210.55%
• 1Y: 209.77%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KNCT vs. STHH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
KNCT Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF	63.41%	37.99%
STHH STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged	209.56%	16.74%

Correlation

The correlation between KNCT and STHH is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.62
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2025	0.61

The correlation between KNCT and STHH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

KNCT vs. STHH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KNCT

KNCT Risk / Return Rank: 96
KNCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
KNCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
KNCT Omega Ratio Rank: 95
KNCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
KNCT Martin Ratio Rank: 97

STHH

STHH Risk / Return Rank: 89
STHH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
STHH Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
STHH Omega Ratio Rank: 91
STHH Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
STHH Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KNCT vs. STHH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF (KNCT) and STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged (STHH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	KNCT	STHH	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	4.70	4.20	+0.50
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	5.72	4.20	+1.51
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.76	1.60	+0.16
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	10.00	6.23	+3.77
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	44.01	14.15	+29.86
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

KNCT vs. STHH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KNCT Sharpe Ratio is 4.70, which is comparable to the STHH Sharpe Ratio of 4.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KNCT and STHH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KNCT	STHH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.70	4.20	+0.50
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.94	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.58	4.44	-3.86

Drawdowns

KNCT vs. STHH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KNCT drawdown since its inception was -57.18%, which is greater than STHH's maximum drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KNCT and STHH.

Drawdown Indicators

	KNCT	STHH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.18%	-33.89%	-23.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.99%	-33.89%	+23.90%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.40%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.55%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.55%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.63%	0.00%	-0.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.74%	-10.46%	-0.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.27%	14.90%	-12.63%

Volatility

KNCT vs. STHH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF (KNCT) is 9.19%, while STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged (STHH) has a volatility of 20.33%. This indicates that KNCT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STHH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KNCT	STHH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.19%	20.33%	-11.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.12%	36.77%	-19.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.28%	50.39%	-29.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.19%	49.44%	-26.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.97%	49.44%	-26.47%

KNCT vs. STHH - Expense Ratio Comparison

KNCT has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than STHH's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

KNCT vs. STHH - Dividend Comparison

KNCT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, more than STHH's 0.55% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
KNCT Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF	0.57%	0.86%	1.38%	0.60%	2.24%	0.55%	0.18%	0.44%	1.22%	0.66%	0.44%
STHH STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged	0.55%	0.69%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KNCT and STHH in my portfolio?

KNCT and STHH have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KNCT or STHH?

STHH has higher volatility (20.33%) compared to KNCT (9.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KNCT dropped -57.18% vs STHH's -33.89%.

Which ETF is better, KNCT or STHH?

On 1-year performance, STHH leads with 209.77% vs 99.38% for KNCT. On fees, STHH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, KNCT has been the lower-risk option at 9.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, KNCT or STHH?

Over the 1-year period, STHH has performed better with a 209.77% return vs 99.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, KNCT or STHH?

STHH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for KNCT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KNCT or STHH?

KNCT has the higher dividend yield at 0.57%, compared with 0.55% for STHH.

What is the main difference between KNCT and STHH?

KNCT tracks STOXX World AC NexGen Connectivity Index, while STHH tracks STMicroelectronics NV Local Shares Total Return. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and ADRhedged. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for KNCT and 0.19% for STHH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

KNCT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.70 vs 4.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.