KNCT vs. QQQM
KNCT (Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF) and QQQM (Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KNCT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the STOXX World AC NexGen Connectivity Index, while QQQM is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, KNCT returned 21.73%/yr vs 18.07%/yr for QQQM. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. KNCT charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QQQM.
Performance
KNCT vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KNCT achieves a 63.41% return, which is significantly higher than QQQM's 21.39% return.
KNCT
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- 26.38%
- YTD
- 63.41%
- 6M
- 62.53%
- 1Y
- 99.38%
- 3Y*
- 43.36%
- 5Y*
- 21.73%
- 10Y*
- 21.42%
QQQM
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 10.67%
- YTD
- 21.39%
- 6M
- 19.75%
- 1Y
- 41.98%
- 3Y*
- 28.89%
- 5Y*
- 18.07%
- 10Y*
- —
KNCT vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KNCT Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF | 63.41% | 28.65% | 19.41% | 27.39% | -29.54% | 21.83% | 14.12% |
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 21.39% | 20.85% | 25.68% | 55.01% | -32.52% | 27.45% | 6.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between KNCT and QQQM is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2020 | 0.85 |
The correlation between KNCT and QQQM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
KNCT vs. QQQM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
KNCT
QQQM
Technology
Communication Services
Real Estate
Industrials
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Utilities
-
Technology
KNCT
QQQM
Communication Services
KNCT
QQQM
Real Estate
KNCT
QQQM
Industrials
KNCT
QQQM
Financial Services
KNCT
QQQM
Basic Materials
KNCT
-
QQQM
Consumer Cyclical
KNCT
-
QQQM
Consumer Defensive
KNCT
-
QQQM
Energy
KNCT
-
QQQM
Healthcare
KNCT
-
QQQM
Utilities
KNCT
-
QQQM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KNCT vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank
KNCT
QQQM
KNCT vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF (KNCT) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KNCT | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 4.70 | 2.65 | +2.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 5.72 | 3.46 | +2.25 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.76 | 1.45 | +0.30 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.00 | 3.53 | +6.48 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 44.01 | 13.52 | +30.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KNCT | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.70 | 2.65 | +2.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 | 0.82 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.94 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.85 | -0.27 |
Drawdowns
KNCT vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KNCT drawdown since its inception was -57.18%, which is greater than QQQM's maximum drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KNCT and QQQM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KNCT | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.18% | -35.04% | -22.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.99% | -11.96% | +1.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.40% | -22.70% | +1.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.55% | -35.04% | +0.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.55% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.63% | -0.20% | -0.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.74% | -8.25% | -2.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.27% | 3.11% | -0.84% |
Volatility
KNCT vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF (KNCT) has a higher volatility of 9.19% compared to Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) at 4.48%. This indicates that KNCT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KNCT | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.19% | 4.48% | +4.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.12% | 12.05% | +5.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.28% | 15.91% | +5.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.19% | 22.24% | +0.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.97% | 22.12% | +0.85% |
KNCT vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison
KNCT has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
KNCT vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison
KNCT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, more than QQQM's 0.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KNCT Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF | 0.57% | 0.86% | 1.38% | 0.60% | 2.24% | 0.55% | 0.18% | 0.44% | 1.22% | 0.66% | 0.44% |
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 0.41% | 0.50% | 0.61% | 0.65% | 0.83% | 0.40% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KNCT and QQQM have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KNCT has higher volatility (9.19%) compared to QQQM (4.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KNCT dropped -57.18% vs QQQM's -35.04%.
On 5-year performance, KNCT leads with 21.73% vs 18.07% for QQQM. On fees, QQQM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, QQQM has been the lower-risk option at 4.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, KNCT has performed better with a 21.73% return vs 18.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for KNCT.
KNCT has the higher dividend yield at 0.57%, compared with 0.41% for QQQM.
KNCT is categorized as Technology Equities, while QQQM is Nasdaq-100. KNCT tracks STOXX World AC NexGen Connectivity Index, while QQQM tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for KNCT and 0.15% for QQQM.
KNCT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.70 vs 2.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KNCT and QQQM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer