PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KMLM vs. QAI
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

KMLM vs. QAI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF (KMLM) and IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF (QAI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

KMLM vs. QAI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
KMLM
KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF
8.67%-2.98%-1.69%-5.66%30.61%7.04%5.40%
QAI
IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF
1.82%8.29%6.67%10.07%-8.68%-0.16%1.61%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KMLM achieves a 8.67% return, which is significantly higher than QAI's 1.82% return.


KMLM

1D
-0.28%
1M
4.21%
YTD
8.67%
6M
10.01%
1Y
8.60%
3Y*
0.44%
5Y*
5.63%
10Y*

QAI

1D
1.25%
1M
-2.23%
YTD
1.82%
6M
2.98%
1Y
10.61%
3Y*
8.05%
5Y*
3.40%
10Y*
3.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


KMLM vs. QAI - Expense Ratio Comparison

KMLM has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than QAI's 0.79% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

KMLM vs. QAI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KMLM
KMLM Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
KMLM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KMLM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
KMLM Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
KMLM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
KMLM Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

QAI
QAI Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
QAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
QAI Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
QAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
QAI Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KMLM vs. QAI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF (KMLM) and IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF (QAI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KMLMQAIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.88

1.41

-0.53

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.27

1.99

-0.72

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.31

-0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.13

1.93

-0.80

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.31

8.93

-5.62

KMLM vs. QAI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KMLM Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is lower than the QAI Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KMLM and QAI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KMLMQAIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

1.41

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

0.53

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.51

-0.03

Correlation

The correlation between KMLM and QAI is -0.11. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

KMLM vs. QAI - Dividend Comparison

KMLM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.62%, more than QAI's 1.48% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KMLM
KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF
4.62%5.02%0.82%0.00%13.22%6.94%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QAI
IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF
1.48%1.50%2.22%4.08%2.00%0.28%1.98%1.91%1.90%0.00%0.00%0.48%

Drawdowns

KMLM vs. QAI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KMLM drawdown since its inception was -27.47%, which is greater than QAI's maximum drawdown of -14.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KMLM and QAI.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


KMLMQAIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.47%

-14.95%

-12.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.73%

-5.43%

-1.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.47%

-14.32%

-13.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.27%

-2.51%

-12.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.73%

-2.60%

-10.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.41%

1.17%

+1.24%

Volatility

KMLM vs. QAI - Volatility Comparison

KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF (KMLM) has a higher volatility of 4.05% compared to IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF (QAI) at 2.83%. This indicates that KMLM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QAI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


KMLMQAIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.05%

2.83%

+1.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.22%

4.95%

+2.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.84%

7.55%

+2.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.57%

6.51%

+8.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.67%

6.12%

+8.55%