PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KMLM vs. CLIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

KMLM vs. CLIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF (KMLM) and ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF (CLIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

KMLM vs. CLIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
KMLM
KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF
8.67%-2.98%-1.69%-5.66%30.61%7.04%5.40%
CLIX
ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF
-11.46%32.81%20.73%28.97%-46.73%-39.96%4.89%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KMLM achieves a 8.67% return, which is significantly higher than CLIX's -11.46% return.


KMLM

1D
-0.28%
1M
4.21%
YTD
8.67%
6M
10.01%
1Y
8.60%
3Y*
0.44%
5Y*
5.63%
10Y*

CLIX

1D
3.23%
1M
-1.05%
YTD
-11.46%
6M
-10.75%
1Y
16.49%
3Y*
17.93%
5Y*
-8.58%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


KMLM vs. CLIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

KMLM has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than CLIX's 0.65% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

KMLM vs. CLIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KMLM
KMLM Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
KMLM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KMLM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
KMLM Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
KMLM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
KMLM Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

CLIX
CLIX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
CLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
CLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KMLM vs. CLIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF (KMLM) and ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF (CLIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KMLMCLIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.88

0.72

+0.16

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.27

1.10

+0.17

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.14

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.13

0.77

+0.36

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.31

2.25

+1.06

KMLM vs. CLIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KMLM Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is comparable to the CLIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KMLM and CLIX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KMLMCLIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

0.72

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

-0.32

+0.71

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.15

+0.34

Correlation

The correlation between KMLM and CLIX is -0.12. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

KMLM vs. CLIX - Dividend Comparison

KMLM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.62%, more than CLIX's 0.60% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
KMLM
KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF
4.62%5.02%0.82%0.00%13.22%6.94%0.00%
CLIX
ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF
0.60%0.46%0.46%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.33%

Drawdowns

KMLM vs. CLIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KMLM drawdown since its inception was -27.47%, smaller than the maximum CLIX drawdown of -73.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KMLM and CLIX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


KMLMCLIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.47%

-73.21%

+45.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.73%

-19.57%

+12.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.47%

-68.22%

+40.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.27%

-47.70%

+32.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.73%

-34.53%

+21.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.41%

6.70%

-4.29%

Volatility

KMLM vs. CLIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF (KMLM) is 4.05%, while ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF (CLIX) has a volatility of 7.78%. This indicates that KMLM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


KMLMCLIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.05%

7.78%

-3.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.22%

16.32%

-9.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.84%

22.94%

-13.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.57%

27.03%

-12.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.67%

26.04%

-11.37%