PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KMLI vs. VRTL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KMLI vs. VRTL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares 2x Long MELI Daily ETF (KMLI) and GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF (VRTL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KMLI achieves a -42.69% return, which is significantly lower than VRTL's 230.54% return.


KMLI

1D
-4.16%
1M
-22.17%
YTD
-42.69%
6M
-49.24%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VRTL

1D
-1.32%
1M
-3.10%
YTD
230.54%
6M
160.92%
1Y
442.54%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KMLI vs. VRTL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
KMLI
KraneShares 2x Long MELI Daily ETF
-42.69%-37.98%
VRTL
GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF
230.54%58.38%

Correlation

The correlation between KMLI and VRTL is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2025

0.14

KMLI vs. VRTL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
KMLI
VRTL

Consumer Cyclical

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

66.7%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

KMLI
100.0%
VRTL

-

Basic Materials

KMLI

-

VRTL

-

Communication Services

KMLI

-

VRTL

-

Consumer Defensive

KMLI

-

VRTL

-

Energy

KMLI

-

VRTL

-

Financial Services

KMLI

-

VRTL

-

Healthcare

KMLI

-

VRTL

-

Industrials

KMLI

-

VRTL
66.7%

Real Estate

KMLI

-

VRTL

-

Technology

KMLI

-

VRTL

-

Utilities

KMLI

-

VRTL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KMLI vs. VRTL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KMLI

VRTL
VRTL Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
VRTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRTL Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
VRTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRTL Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KMLI vs. VRTL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares 2x Long MELI Daily ETF (KMLI) and GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF (VRTL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

KMLI vs. VRTL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KMLIVRTLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.91

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.83

3.29

-4.12

Drawdowns

KMLI vs. VRTL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KMLI drawdown since its inception was -73.23%, which is greater than VRTL's maximum drawdown of -60.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KMLI and VRTL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KMLIVRTLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.23%

-60.58%

-12.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-47.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-70.50%

-24.11%

-46.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.90%

-15.16%

-25.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.53%

Volatility

KMLI vs. VRTL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KMLIVRTLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

33.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

87.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

79.42%

114.32%

-34.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

79.42%

124.39%

-44.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

79.42%

124.39%

-44.97%

KMLI vs. VRTL - Expense Ratio Comparison

KMLI has a 1.26% expense ratio, which is lower than VRTL's 1.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

KMLI vs. VRTL - Dividend Comparison

KMLI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.55%, while VRTL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


KMLI and VRTL have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, KMLI is cheaper at 1.26% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

KMLI is cheaper with a 1.26% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for VRTL.

KMLI has the higher dividend yield at 18.55%, compared with 0.00% for VRTL.

They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 1.26% for KMLI and 1.50% for VRTL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KMLI and VRTL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer