KMLI vs. VRTL

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

KMLI (KraneShares 2x Long MELI Daily ETF) and VRTL (GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, KMLI returned -69.10% vs 343.57% for VRTL. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KMLI charges 1.26%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for VRTL.

Performance

KMLI vs. VRTL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares 2x Long MELI Daily ETF (KMLI) and GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF (VRTL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KMLI achieves a -46.82% return, which is significantly lower than VRTL's 187.83% return.

KMLI

• 1D: -0.46%
• 1M: -11.01%
• YTD: -46.82%
• 6M: -46.08%
• 1Y: -69.10%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VRTL

• 1D: -22.65%
• 1M: -11.35%
• YTD: 187.83%
• 6M: 172.02%
• 1Y: 343.57%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KMLI vs. VRTL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
KMLI KraneShares 2x Long MELI Daily ETF	-46.82%	-38.14%
VRTL GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF	187.83%	70.38%

Correlation

The correlation between KMLI and VRTL is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2025	0.13

KMLI vs. VRTL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	KMLI	VRTL
Consumer Cyclical	100.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	66.7%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

KMLI vs. VRTL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KMLI

KMLI Risk / Return Rank: 1
KMLI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
KMLI Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
KMLI Omega Ratio Rank: 1
KMLI Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
KMLI Martin Ratio Rank: 1

VRTL

VRTL Risk / Return Rank: 83
VRTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
VRTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
VRTL Omega Ratio Rank: 70
VRTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
VRTL Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KMLI vs. VRTL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares 2x Long MELI Daily ETF (KMLI) and GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF (VRTL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KMLI	VRTL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.88	2.89	-3.77
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.37	3.02	-4.39
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.82	1.38	-0.56
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.95	7.30	-8.24
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.45	17.10	-18.55

KMLI vs. VRTL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KMLI Sharpe Ratio is -0.88, which is lower than the VRTL Sharpe Ratio of 2.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KMLI and VRTL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

KMLI vs. VRTL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KMLI drawdown since its inception was -73.23%, which is greater than VRTL's maximum drawdown of -60.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KMLI and VRTL.

Drawdown Indicators

	KMLI	VRTL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-73.23%	-60.58%	-12.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-73.23%	-47.45%	-25.78%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-72.63%	-33.92%	-38.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-42.28%	-15.93%	-26.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	47.75%	20.20%	+27.55%

Volatility

KMLI vs. VRTL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for KraneShares 2x Long MELI Daily ETF (KMLI) is 18.41%, while GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF (VRTL) has a volatility of 43.78%. This indicates that KMLI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VRTL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KMLI	VRTL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.41%	43.78%	-25.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	61.16%	92.17%	-31.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	78.94%	119.83%	-40.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	78.49%	126.87%	-48.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	78.49%	126.87%	-48.38%

KMLI vs. VRTL - Expense Ratio Comparison

KMLI has a 1.26% expense ratio, which is lower than VRTL's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

KMLI vs. VRTL - Dividend Comparison

KMLI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.99%, while VRTL has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
KMLI KraneShares 2x Long MELI Daily ETF	19.99%	10.63%
VRTL GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KMLI and VRTL in my portfolio?

KMLI and VRTL have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KMLI or VRTL?

VRTL has higher volatility (43.78%) compared to KMLI (18.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KMLI dropped -73.23% vs VRTL's -60.58%.

Which ETF is better, KMLI or VRTL?

On 1-year performance, VRTL leads with 343.57% vs -69.10% for KMLI. On fees, KMLI is cheaper at 1.26% per year. On volatility, KMLI has been the lower-risk option at 18.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, KMLI or VRTL?

Over the 1-year period, VRTL has performed better with a 343.57% return vs -69.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, KMLI or VRTL?

KMLI is cheaper with a 1.26% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for VRTL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KMLI or VRTL?

KMLI has the higher dividend yield at 19.99%, compared with 0.00% for VRTL.

What is the main difference between KMLI and VRTL?

They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 1.26% for KMLI and 1.50% for VRTL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VRTL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.89 vs -0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.