PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KMLI vs. BIDG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KMLI vs. BIDG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares 2x Long MELI Daily ETF (KMLI) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BIDU Daily ETF (BIDG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KMLI achieves a -44.90% return, which is significantly higher than BIDG's -47.16% return.


KMLI

1D
-5.19%
1M
-5.53%
YTD
-44.90%
6M
-44.26%
1Y
-70.09%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BIDG

1D
-7.34%
1M
-35.13%
YTD
-47.16%
6M
-40.94%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KMLI vs. BIDG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between KMLI and BIDG is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2025

0.19

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KMLI vs. BIDG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KMLI
KMLI Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
KMLI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KMLI Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
KMLI Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
KMLI Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
KMLI Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

BIDG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KMLI vs. BIDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares 2x Long MELI Daily ETF (KMLI) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BIDU Daily ETF (BIDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KMLIBIDGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.82

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.46

KMLI vs. BIDG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KMLI vs. BIDG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KMLI drawdown since its inception was -73.23%, which is greater than BIDG's maximum drawdown of -64.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KMLI and BIDG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KMLIBIDGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.23%

-64.84%

-8.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-73.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-71.64%

-64.84%

-6.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.50%

-34.77%

-7.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

48.16%

Volatility

KMLI vs. BIDG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KMLIBIDGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

61.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

79.30%

102.33%

-23.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

78.90%

102.33%

-23.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

78.90%

102.33%

-23.43%

KMLI vs. BIDG - Expense Ratio Comparison

KMLI has a 1.26% expense ratio, which is higher than BIDG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

KMLI vs. BIDG - Dividend Comparison

KMLI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.29%, while BIDG has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


KMLI and BIDG have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BIDG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BIDG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.26% for KMLI.

KMLI has the higher dividend yield at 19.29%, compared with 0.00% for BIDG.

They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.26% for KMLI and 0.75% for BIDG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KMLI and BIDG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer