KLMT vs. POW

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

KLMT (Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF) and POW (VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KLMT is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Select Climate 500 Index, while POW is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by VistaShares. KLMT is passively managed, while POW is actively managed. Their 0.72 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. KLMT charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for POW.

Performance

KLMT vs. POW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF (KLMT) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KLMT achieves a 15.17% return, which is significantly lower than POW's 38.98% return.

KLMT

• 1D: 1.68%
• 1M: 3.32%
• 6M: 12.38%
• YTD: 15.17%
• 1Y: 25.45%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 19.93%

POW

• 1D: 3.56%
• 1M: -5.46%
• 6M: 18.56%
• YTD: 38.98%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
KLMT Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF	$56.55K	$62.22K	$75.80K
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF	$1.18M	$2.14M	$2.63M

KLMT vs. POW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
KLMT Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF	15.17%	-0.12%
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF	38.98%	-1.70%

Correlation

The correlation between KLMT and POW is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025	0.72

Return for Risk

KLMT vs. POW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

KLMT

KLMT Risk / Return Rank: 72
KLMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
KLMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
KLMT Omega Ratio Rank: 70
KLMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
KLMT Martin Ratio Rank: 78

POW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

KLMT vs. POW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF (KLMT) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KLMT	POW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.87	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.58	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.68	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.17	—	—

Drawdowns

KLMT vs. POW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KLMT drawdown since its inception was -16.87%, smaller than the maximum POW drawdown of -28.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KLMT and POW.

Drawdown Indicators

	KLMT	POW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.87%	-28.02%	+11.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.54%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-18.34%	+18.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.87%	-5.66%	+3.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.28%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	KLMT	POW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.16%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.52%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.76%	34.48%	-20.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.89%	34.48%	-18.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.89%	34.48%	-18.59%

KLMT vs. POW - Expense Ratio Comparison

KLMT has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than POW's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

KLMT vs. POW - Dividend Comparison

KLMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.71%, more than POW's 0.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
KLMT Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF	1.71%	1.95%	0.85%
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF	0.14%	0.19%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KLMT and POW in my portfolio?

KLMT and POW have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, KLMT or POW?

On fees, KLMT is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, KLMT or POW?

KLMT is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for POW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KLMT or POW?

KLMT has the higher dividend yield at 1.71%, compared with 0.14% for POW.

What is the main difference between KLMT and POW?

KLMT is categorized as Global Equities, while POW is Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for KLMT and 0.75% for POW.