KLMN vs. XLG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

KLMN (Invesco MSCI North America Climate ETF) and XLG (Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KLMN is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI Global Climate 500 North America Selection Index, while XLG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Top 50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, KLMN returned 27.74% vs 28.54% for XLG. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. KLMN charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XLG.

Performance

KLMN vs. XLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco MSCI North America Climate ETF (KLMN) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KLMN achieves a 10.80% return, which is significantly higher than XLG's 7.57% return.

KLMN

• 1D: -0.74%
• 1M: 5.01%
• YTD: 10.80%
• 6M: 10.80%
• 1Y: 27.74%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XLG

• 1D: -1.15%
• 1M: 4.22%
• YTD: 7.57%
• 6M: 7.32%
• 1Y: 28.54%
• 3Y*: 24.46%
• 5Y*: 16.24%
• 10Y*: 17.27%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KLMN vs. XLG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
KLMN Invesco MSCI North America Climate ETF	10.80%	18.24%	-3.62%
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF	7.57%	19.51%	-2.59%

Correlation

The correlation between KLMN and XLG is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2024	0.93

The correlation between KLMN and XLG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

KLMN vs. XLG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KLMN

KLMN Risk / Return Rank: 70
KLMN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
KLMN Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
KLMN Omega Ratio Rank: 69
KLMN Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
KLMN Martin Ratio Rank: 75

XLG

XLG Risk / Return Rank: 56
XLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
XLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
XLG Omega Ratio Rank: 61
XLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
XLG Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KLMN vs. XLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI North America Climate ETF (KLMN) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	KLMN	XLG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.28	2.15	+0.13
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.12	2.92	+0.20
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.38	+0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.11	2.31	+0.80
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	14.14	8.66	+5.47
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

KLMN vs. XLG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KLMN Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is comparable to the XLG Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KLMN and XLG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KLMN	XLG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.28	2.15	+0.13
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.87	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.92	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.99	0.62	+0.36

Drawdowns

KLMN vs. XLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KLMN drawdown since its inception was -19.16%, smaller than the maximum XLG drawdown of -52.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KLMN and XLG.

Drawdown Indicators

	KLMN	XLG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.16%	-52.39%	+33.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.96%	-12.41%	+3.45%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-20.70%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-28.02%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-30.46%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.74%	-1.44%	+0.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.54%	-7.64%	+5.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.97%	3.30%	-1.33%

Volatility

KLMN vs. XLG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco MSCI North America Climate ETF (KLMN) is 2.95%, while Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG) has a volatility of 3.19%. This indicates that KLMN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KLMN	XLG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.95%	3.19%	-0.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.21%	9.80%	-0.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.22%	13.33%	-1.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.61%	18.68%	-1.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.61%	18.84%	-1.23%

KLMN vs. XLG - Expense Ratio Comparison

KLMN has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than XLG's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

KLMN vs. XLG - Dividend Comparison

KLMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, more than XLG's 0.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
KLMN Invesco MSCI North America Climate ETF	1.28%	1.25%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF	0.60%	0.64%	0.72%	0.97%	1.34%	0.94%	1.25%	1.58%	2.00%	1.85%	2.00%	2.09%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KLMN and XLG in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, KLMN and XLG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, KLMN or XLG?

XLG has higher volatility (3.19%) compared to KLMN (2.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KLMN dropped -19.16% vs XLG's -52.39%.

Which ETF is better, KLMN or XLG?

On 1-year performance, XLG leads with 28.54% vs 27.74% for KLMN. On fees, KLMN is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, KLMN has been the lower-risk option at 2.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, KLMN or XLG?

Over the 1-year period, XLG has performed better with a 28.54% return vs 27.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, KLMN or XLG?

KLMN is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XLG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KLMN or XLG?

KLMN has the higher dividend yield at 1.28%, compared with 0.60% for XLG.

What is the main difference between KLMN and XLG?

KLMN is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while XLG is S&P 500. KLMN tracks MSCI Global Climate 500 North America Selection Index, while XLG tracks S&P 500 Top 50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for KLMN and 0.20% for XLG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

KLMN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.