PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KLIP vs. XAPR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

KLIP vs. XAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April (XAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

KLIP vs. XAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KLIP achieves a -8.98% return, which is significantly lower than XAPR's 1.10% return.


KLIP

1D
2.10%
1M
-5.77%
YTD
-8.98%
6M
-12.63%
1Y
-1.25%
3Y*
7.62%
5Y*
10Y*

XAPR

1D
0.22%
1M
0.35%
YTD
1.10%
6M
2.86%
1Y
12.23%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


KLIP vs. XAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

KLIP has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than XAPR's 0.85% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

KLIP vs. XAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KLIP
KLIP Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
KLIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KLIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
KLIP Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
KLIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
KLIP Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

XAPR
XAPR Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
XAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
XAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
XAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
XAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KLIP vs. XAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April (XAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KLIPXAPRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.06

1.51

-1.57

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.05

2.48

-2.43

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.66

-0.65

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.08

2.01

-2.08

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.26

18.98

-19.24

KLIP vs. XAPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KLIP Sharpe Ratio is -0.06, which is lower than the XAPR Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KLIP and XAPR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KLIPXAPRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.06

1.51

-1.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

1.78

-1.44

Correlation

The correlation between KLIP and XAPR is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

KLIP vs. XAPR - Dividend Comparison

KLIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 28.24%, while XAPR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Drawdowns

KLIP vs. XAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KLIP drawdown since its inception was -18.61%, which is greater than XAPR's maximum drawdown of -6.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KLIP and XAPR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


KLIPXAPRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.61%

-6.18%

-12.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.23%

-6.18%

-11.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.21%

0.00%

-14.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.34%

-0.18%

-3.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.18%

0.65%

+4.53%

Volatility

KLIP vs. XAPR - Volatility Comparison

KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP) has a higher volatility of 7.16% compared to FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April (XAPR) at 0.45%. This indicates that KLIP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


KLIPXAPRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.16%

0.45%

+6.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.48%

1.19%

+12.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.76%

8.15%

+11.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.19%

6.41%

+11.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.19%

6.41%

+11.78%