KLIP vs. SPYI
KLIP (KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF) and SPYI (NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KLIP is a Options Trading fund managed by CICC, while SPYI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Neos. Over the past 3 years, KLIP returned 5.58%/yr vs 15.39%/yr for SPYI. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KLIP charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for SPYI.
Performance
KLIP vs. SPYI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KLIP achieves a -10.03% return, which is significantly lower than SPYI's 8.30% return.
KLIP
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- -1.18%
- 6M
- -14.56%
- YTD
- -10.03%
- 1Y
- -5.93%
- 3Y*
- 5.58%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPYI
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- 1.87%
- 6M
- 7.00%
- YTD
- 8.30%
- 1Y
- 18.85%
- 3Y*
- 15.39%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KLIP vs. SPYI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
KLIP KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF | -10.03% | 16.92% | 3.37% | 11.11% |
SPYI NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF | 8.30% | 16.67% | 19.03% | 15.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between KLIP and SPYI is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2023 | 0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KLIP vs. SPYI — Risk / Return Rank
KLIP
SPYI
KLIP vs. SPYI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP) and NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF (SPYI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KLIP | SPYI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.35 | -0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.28 | 2.45 | -2.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.69 | 11.98 | -12.67 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KLIP vs. SPYI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KLIP drawdown since its inception was -21.48%, which is greater than SPYI's maximum drawdown of -16.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KLIP and SPYI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KLIP | SPYI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.48% | -16.47% | -5.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.48% | -7.72% | -13.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.48% | -16.47% | -5.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.19% | -0.26% | -14.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.18% | -1.80% | -2.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.65% | 1.58% | +7.07% |
Volatility
KLIP vs. SPYI - Volatility Comparison
KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP) has a higher volatility of 5.26% compared to NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF (SPYI) at 3.36%. This indicates that KLIP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KLIP | SPYI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.26% | 3.36% | +1.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.10% | 8.45% | +4.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.55% | 10.44% | +6.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.10% | 12.97% | +5.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.10% | 12.97% | +5.13% |
KLIP vs. SPYI - Expense Ratio Comparison
KLIP has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYI's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
KLIP vs. SPYI - Dividend Comparison
KLIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 28.64%, more than SPYI's 11.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KLIP KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF | 28.64% | 25.14% | 54.26% | 61.22% | 0.00% |
SPYI NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF | 11.74% | 11.70% | 12.04% | 12.01% | 4.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KLIP and SPYI have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KLIP has higher volatility (5.26%) compared to SPYI (3.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KLIP dropped -21.48% vs SPYI's -16.47%.
On 3-year performance, SPYI leads with 15.39% vs 5.58% for KLIP. On fees, SPYI is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, SPYI has been the lower-risk option at 3.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SPYI has performed better with a 15.39% return vs 5.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYI is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for KLIP.
KLIP has the higher dividend yield at 28.64%, compared with 11.74% for SPYI.
KLIP is categorized as Options Trading, while SPYI is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: CICC and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for KLIP and 0.68% for SPYI.
SPYI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs -0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KLIP and SPYI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer