KLIP vs. CN

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

KLIP (KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF) and CN (Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF) are both China Equities funds. KLIP is actively managed, while CN is passively managed. Their 0.51 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. KLIP charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for CN.

Performance

KLIP vs. CN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP) and Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

KLIP

• 1D: 0.31%
• 1M: 6.50%
• 6M: -11.47%
• YTD: -7.10%
• 1Y: -3.45%
• 3Y*: 6.19%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 6.43%

CN

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
KLIP KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF	$623.83K	$609.30K	$993.79K

KLIP vs. CN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
KLIP KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF	-7.10%	16.92%	3.37%	11.11%
CN Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF	0.00%	0.00%	-3.10%	-19.83%

Correlation

The correlation between KLIP and CN is 0.51, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.39
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2023	0.51

The correlation between KLIP and CN shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (3 years) to 0.51 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

KLIP vs. CN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	KLIP	CN
Communication Services	45.8%	0.4%
Consumer Cyclical	34.2%	5.4%
Healthcare	6.0%	0.8%
Technology	4.2%	0.3%
Consumer Defensive	4.0%	0.3%
Real Estate	3.9%	0.8%
Financial Services	2.0%	55.1%
Basic Materials	-	0.6%
Energy	-	0.9%
Industrials	-	1.0%
Utilities	-	0.2%

Return for Risk

KLIP vs. CN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

KLIP

KLIP Risk / Return Rank: 7
KLIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
KLIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
KLIP Omega Ratio Rank: 7
KLIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
KLIP Martin Ratio Rank: 8

CN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

KLIP vs. CN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP) and Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KLIP	CN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.26	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.25	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.20	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.46	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	KLIP	CN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.48%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.48%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.48%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.44%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.32%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.19%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	KLIP	CN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.40%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.02%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.59%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.99%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.99%	—	—

KLIP vs. CN - Expense Ratio Comparison

KLIP has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than CN's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

KLIP vs. CN - Dividend Comparison

KLIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 27.63%, while CN has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CN Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	4.04%	1.80%	2.00%	0.78%	4.18%	2.09%	0.81%	11.41%	14.00%
KLIP KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF	27.63%	25.14%	54.26%	61.22%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KLIP and CN in my portfolio?

KLIP and CN have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, KLIP or CN?

On fees, CN is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, KLIP or CN?

CN is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for KLIP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KLIP or CN?

KLIP has the higher dividend yield at 27.63%, compared with 0.00% for CN.

What is the main difference between KLIP and CN?

They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for KLIP and 0.50% for CN.