PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KIQQ vs. QYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KIQQ vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares InspereX Nasdaq Dynamic Buffered High Income Index ETF (KIQQ) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


KIQQ

1D
-3.57%
1M
0.99%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QYLD

1D
-1.82%
1M
-0.67%
YTD
5.92%
6M
7.78%
1Y
21.82%
3Y*
13.07%
5Y*
8.04%
10Y*
9.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KIQQ vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between KIQQ and QYLD is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2026

0.81

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KIQQ vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KIQQ

QYLD
QYLD Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
QYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
QYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
QYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
QYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KIQQ vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares InspereX Nasdaq Dynamic Buffered High Income Index ETF (KIQQ) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

KIQQ vs. QYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KIQQQYLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.16

0.58

+0.58

Drawdowns

KIQQ vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KIQQ drawdown since its inception was -8.89%, smaller than the maximum QYLD drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KIQQ and QYLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KIQQQYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.89%

-24.75%

+15.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.01%

-1.87%

-2.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.44%

-3.84%

+1.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.85%

Volatility

KIQQ vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KIQQQYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.55%

8.78%

+5.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.55%

14.71%

-0.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.55%

15.50%

-0.95%

KIQQ vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

KIQQ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

KIQQ vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison

KIQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.66%, less than QYLD's 11.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KIQQ
KraneShares InspereX Nasdaq Dynamic Buffered High Income Index ETF
3.66%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
11.67%11.55%12.50%11.78%13.75%12.85%11.16%9.84%12.44%7.69%9.15%9.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


KIQQ and QYLD have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QYLD is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QYLD is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for KIQQ.

QYLD has the higher dividend yield at 11.67%, compared with 3.66% for KIQQ.

KIQQ is categorized as Derivative Income, while QYLD is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for KIQQ and 0.60% for QYLD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KIQQ and QYLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer