KINS vs. GLDD

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

KINS (Kingstone Companies, Inc.) and GLDD (Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation) are both stocks. KINS operates in Insurance - Property & Casualty (Financial Services), while GLDD operates in Engineering & Construction (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, KINS returned 7.27%/yr vs 13.96%/yr for GLDD. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

KINS vs. GLDD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kingstone Companies, Inc. (KINS) and Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation (GLDD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KINS achieves a -9.29% return, which is significantly lower than GLDD's 29.57% return. Over the past 10 years, KINS has underperformed GLDD with an annualized return of 7.27%, while GLDD has yielded a comparatively higher 13.96% annualized return.

KINS

• 1D: 0.86%
• 1M: -2.13%
• YTD: -9.29%
• 6M: 1.91%
• 1Y: -2.30%
• 3Y*: 122.25%
• 5Y*: 14.73%
• 10Y*: 7.27%

GLDD

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 29.57%
• 6M: 30.27%
• 1Y: 46.30%
• 3Y*: 32.55%
• 5Y*: 2.82%
• 10Y*: 13.96%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KINS vs. GLDD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
KINS Kingstone Companies, Inc.	-9.29%	11.54%	613.15%	57.78%	-72.27%	-22.97%	-11.56%	-54.74%	-3.80%	39.37%
GLDD Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation	29.57%	16.21%	47.01%	29.08%	-62.15%	19.36%	16.24%	71.15%	22.59%	28.57%

Correlation

The correlation between KINS and GLDD is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.13
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.17
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.12
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2006	0.09

Fundamentals

Market Cap KINS : $219.26M GLDD : $1.15B
EPS KINS : -$399.22 GLDD : $1.09
PS Ratio KINS : 0.00 GLDD : 1.29
PB Ratio KINS : 0.00 GLDD : 2.23
Total Revenue (TTM) KINS : $59.92B GLDD : $888.28M
Gross Profit (TTM) KINS : $100.92M GLDD : $203.49M
EBITDA (TTM) KINS : -$6.57B GLDD : $125.52M

Return for Risk

KINS vs. GLDD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KINS

KINS Risk / Return Rank: 36
KINS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
KINS Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
KINS Omega Ratio Rank: 34
KINS Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
KINS Martin Ratio Rank: 36

GLDD

GLDD Risk / Return Rank: 83
GLDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
GLDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
GLDD Omega Ratio Rank: 82
GLDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
GLDD Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KINS vs. GLDD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kingstone Companies, Inc. (KINS) and Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation (GLDD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	KINS	GLDD	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.06	1.48	-1.53
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.20	2.53	-2.33
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.02	1.33	-0.31
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.10	3.16	-3.25
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.21	9.69	-9.91
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

KINS vs. GLDD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KINS Sharpe Ratio is -0.06, which is lower than the GLDD Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KINS and GLDD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KINS	GLDD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.06	1.48	-1.53
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.20	0.07	+0.14
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.12	0.33	-0.21
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.07	0.12	-0.05

Drawdowns

KINS vs. GLDD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KINS drawdown since its inception was -96.97%, which is greater than GLDD's maximum drawdown of -80.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KINS and GLDD.

Drawdown Indicators

	KINS	GLDD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.97%	-80.76%	-16.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.22%	-14.74%	-9.48%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-38.84%	-39.75%	+0.91%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-91.00%	-70.30%	-20.70%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-96.20%	-70.32%	-25.88%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-29.08%	0.00%	-29.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-49.30%	-32.87%	-16.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.82%	4.79%	+6.03%

Volatility

KINS vs. GLDD - Volatility Comparison

Kingstone Companies, Inc. (KINS) has a higher volatility of 15.55% compared to Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation (GLDD) at 0.00%. This indicates that KINS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLDD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KINS	GLDD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.55%	0.00%	+15.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	28.66%	19.04%	+9.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	39.74%	31.60%	+8.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	72.67%	41.24%	+31.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	59.33%	42.65%	+16.68%

Dividends

KINS vs. GLDD - Dividend Comparison

KINS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, while GLDD has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GLDD Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
KINS Kingstone Companies, Inc.	1.32%	0.59%	0.00%	0.00%	8.89%	3.20%	2.74%	4.19%	2.26%	1.61%	1.82%	2.36%

Financials

KINS vs. GLDD - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Kingstone Companies, Inc. and Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

KINS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kingstone Companies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 59.78B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

GLDD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation reported a gross profit of 53.64M and revenue of 256.45M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.9%.

KINS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kingstone Companies, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 59.78B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

GLDD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation reported an operating income of 30.34M and revenue of 256.45M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.8%.

KINS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kingstone Companies, Inc. reported a net income of -5.81B and revenue of 59.78B, resulting in a net margin of -9.7%.

GLDD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation reported a net income of 12.63M and revenue of 256.45M, resulting in a net margin of 4.9%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KINS and GLDD in my portfolio?

KINS and GLDD have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KINS or GLDD?

KINS has higher volatility (15.55%) compared to GLDD (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KINS dropped -96.97% vs GLDD's -80.76%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GLDD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.