PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KHPI vs. RBLY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KHPI vs. RBLY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kensington Hedged Premium Income ETF (KHPI) and YieldMax RBLX Option Income Strategy ETF (RBLY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KHPI achieves a 6.36% return, which is significantly higher than RBLY's -55.31% return.


KHPI

1D
0.30%
1M
0.85%
6M
5.48%
YTD
6.36%
1Y
12.35%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.42%

RBLY

1D
-24.81%
1M
-31.51%
6M
-44.86%
YTD
-55.31%
1Y
-68.34%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-66.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.26M$2.17M$2.33M
$212.05K$224.38K$157.63K

KHPI vs. RBLY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between KHPI and RBLY is 0.25, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2025

0.24

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KHPI vs. RBLY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

KHPI
KHPI Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
KHPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KHPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
KHPI Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
KHPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
KHPI Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

RBLY
RBLY Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
RBLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RBLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
RBLY Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
RBLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
RBLY Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

KHPI vs. RBLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kensington Hedged Premium Income ETF (KHPI) and YieldMax RBLX Option Income Strategy ETF (RBLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KHPIRBLYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

0.71

+0.57

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.76

-0.99

+2.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.03

-1.62

+9.65

KHPI vs. RBLY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KHPI Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is higher than the RBLY Sharpe Ratio of -1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KHPI and RBLY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KHPI vs. RBLY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KHPI drawdown since its inception was -10.58%, smaller than the maximum RBLY drawdown of -71.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KHPI and RBLY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KHPIRBLYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.58%

-71.61%

+61.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.55%

-71.61%

+65.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.08%

-71.61%

+71.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.19%

-37.44%

+36.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.43%

43.79%

-42.36%

Volatility

KHPI vs. RBLY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Kensington Hedged Premium Income ETF (KHPI) is 1.49%, while YieldMax RBLX Option Income Strategy ETF (RBLY) has a volatility of 30.27%. This indicates that KHPI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RBLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KHPIRBLYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.49%

30.27%

-28.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.95%

50.88%

-44.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.56%

58.64%

-51.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.46%

58.66%

-49.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.46%

58.66%

-49.20%

KHPI vs. RBLY - Expense Ratio Comparison

KHPI has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is lower than RBLY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

KHPI vs. RBLY - Dividend Comparison

KHPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.93%, less than RBLY's 197.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
KHPI
Kensington Hedged Premium Income ETF
8.93%8.90%3.01%
RBLY
YieldMax RBLX Option Income Strategy ETF
197.07%36.84%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


KHPI and RBLY have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RBLY has higher volatility (30.27%) compared to KHPI (1.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KHPI dropped -10.58% vs RBLY's -71.61%.

On 1-year performance, KHPI leads with 12.35% vs -68.34% for RBLY. On fees, KHPI is cheaper at 0.96% per year. On volatility, KHPI has been the lower-risk option at 1.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, KHPI has performed better with a 12.35% return vs -68.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

KHPI is cheaper with a 0.96% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for RBLY.

RBLY has the higher dividend yield at 197.07%, compared with 8.93% for KHPI.

They also come from different issuers: Kensington and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.96% for KHPI and 0.99% for RBLY.

KHPI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs -1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KHPI and RBLY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer