KGRN vs. IVOL
KGRN (KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF) and IVOL (Quadratic Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KGRN is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China IMI Environment 10/40 Index, while IVOL is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund actively managed by CICC. KGRN is passively managed, while IVOL is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, KGRN returned -7.84%/yr vs -5.75%/yr for IVOL. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. KGRN charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for IVOL.
Performance
KGRN vs. IVOL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KGRN achieves a 0.04% return, which is significantly higher than IVOL's -6.22% return.
KGRN
- 1D
- -0.84%
- 1M
- -6.12%
- YTD
- 0.04%
- 6M
- -2.21%
- 1Y
- 4.70%
- 3Y*
- 2.68%
- 5Y*
- -7.84%
- 10Y*
- —
IVOL
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -3.28%
- YTD
- -6.22%
- 6M
- -6.48%
- 1Y
- -5.75%
- 3Y*
- -3.70%
- 5Y*
- -5.75%
- 10Y*
- —
KGRN vs. IVOL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KGRN KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF | 0.04% | 21.45% | -1.11% | -14.75% | -40.45% | 5.91% | 138.49% | 7.10% |
IVOL Quadratic Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF | -6.22% | 11.97% | -11.07% | -5.18% | -12.69% | -0.31% | 14.56% | 3.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between KGRN and IVOL is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2019 | -0.01 |
KGRN vs. IVOL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
KGRN
IVOL
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
Technology
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
KGRN
IVOL
-
Industrials
KGRN
IVOL
-
Utilities
KGRN
IVOL
-
Technology
KGRN
IVOL
-
Energy
KGRN
IVOL
-
Basic Materials
KGRN
-
IVOL
-
Communication Services
KGRN
-
IVOL
-
Consumer Defensive
KGRN
-
IVOL
-
Financial Services
KGRN
-
IVOL
Healthcare
KGRN
-
IVOL
-
Real Estate
KGRN
-
IVOL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KGRN vs. IVOL — Risk / Return Rank
KGRN
IVOL
KGRN vs. IVOL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF (KGRN) and Quadratic Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF (IVOL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KGRN | IVOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 0.87 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.27 | -0.59 | +0.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.46 | -1.31 | +1.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KGRN | IVOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 | -0.84 | +1.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.23 | -0.45 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.07 | -0.11 | +0.18 |
Drawdowns
KGRN vs. IVOL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KGRN drawdown since its inception was -66.24%, which is greater than IVOL's maximum drawdown of -31.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KGRN and IVOL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KGRN | IVOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.24% | -31.16% | -35.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.26% | -9.81% | -7.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.19% | -16.02% | -26.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.60% | -30.62% | -32.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -47.62% | -26.25% | -21.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.96% | -13.31% | -20.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.13% | 4.42% | +5.71% |
Volatility
KGRN vs. IVOL - Volatility Comparison
KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF (KGRN) has a higher volatility of 7.36% compared to Quadratic Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF (IVOL) at 1.10%. This indicates that KGRN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVOL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KGRN | IVOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.36% | 1.10% | +6.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.12% | 4.44% | +10.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.05% | 6.90% | +16.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.75% | 12.84% | +21.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.86% | 11.99% | +20.87% |
KGRN vs. IVOL - Expense Ratio Comparison
KGRN has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than IVOL's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
KGRN vs. IVOL - Dividend Comparison
KGRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, less than IVOL's 3.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVOL Quadratic Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF | 3.89% | 3.61% | 3.83% | 3.73% | 3.92% | 3.93% | 3.44% | 2.02% | 0.00% |
KGRN KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF | 0.85% | 0.85% | 1.49% | 0.74% | 1.98% | 0.41% | 0.01% | 5.88% | 2.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KGRN and IVOL have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KGRN has higher volatility (7.36%) compared to IVOL (1.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KGRN dropped -66.24% vs IVOL's -31.16%.
On 5-year performance, IVOL leads with -5.75% vs -7.84% for KGRN. On fees, KGRN is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, IVOL has been the lower-risk option at 1.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IVOL has performed better with a -5.75% return vs -7.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
KGRN is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for IVOL.
IVOL has the higher dividend yield at 3.89%, compared with 0.85% for KGRN.
KGRN is categorized as China Equities, while IVOL is Inflation-Protected Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for KGRN and 0.99% for IVOL.
KGRN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.20 vs -0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KGRN and IVOL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer