KGRN vs. DRAG
KGRN (KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF) and DRAG (Roundhill China Dragons ETF) are both China Equities funds. KGRN is passively managed, while DRAG is actively managed. KGRN charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for DRAG.
Performance
KGRN vs. DRAG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
KGRN
- 1D
- -0.84%
- 1M
- -6.12%
- YTD
- 0.04%
- 6M
- -2.21%
- 1Y
- 4.70%
- 3Y*
- 2.68%
- 5Y*
- -7.84%
- 10Y*
- —
DRAG
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KGRN vs. DRAG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
KGRN KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF | -2.74% |
DRAG Roundhill China Dragons ETF | 0.00% |
KGRN vs. DRAG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
KGRN
DRAG
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
Technology
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
KGRN
DRAG
Industrials
KGRN
DRAG
-
Utilities
KGRN
DRAG
-
Technology
KGRN
DRAG
Energy
KGRN
DRAG
-
Basic Materials
KGRN
-
DRAG
-
Communication Services
KGRN
-
DRAG
Consumer Defensive
KGRN
-
DRAG
-
Financial Services
KGRN
-
DRAG
-
Healthcare
KGRN
-
DRAG
-
Real Estate
KGRN
-
DRAG
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KGRN vs. DRAG — Risk / Return Rank
KGRN
DRAG
KGRN vs. DRAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF (KGRN) and Roundhill China Dragons ETF (DRAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KGRN | DRAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.27 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.46 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KGRN | DRAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.23 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.07 | — | — |
Drawdowns
KGRN vs. DRAG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KGRN drawdown since its inception was -66.24%, which is greater than DRAG's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KGRN and DRAG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KGRN | DRAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.24% | 0.00% | -66.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.26% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.19% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.60% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -47.62% | 0.00% | -47.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.96% | 0.00% | -33.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.13% | — | — |
Volatility
KGRN vs. DRAG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KGRN | DRAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.36% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.12% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.05% | 0.00% | +23.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.75% | 0.00% | +34.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.86% | 0.00% | +32.86% |
KGRN vs. DRAG - Expense Ratio Comparison
KGRN has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than DRAG's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
KGRN vs. DRAG - Dividend Comparison
KGRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, while DRAG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRAG Roundhill China Dragons ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KGRN KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF | 0.85% | 0.85% | 1.49% | 0.74% | 1.98% | 0.41% | 0.01% | 5.88% | 2.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, DRAG is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DRAG is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for KGRN.
KGRN has the higher dividend yield at 0.85%, compared with 0.00% for DRAG.
They also come from different issuers: CICC and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for KGRN and 0.59% for DRAG.
Find the right allocation for KGRN and DRAG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer