KGLD vs. GDX
KGLD (Kurv Gold Enhanced Income ETF ) and GDX (VanEck Gold Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KGLD is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Kurv, while GDX is a Gold fund tracking the NYSE MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index. KGLD is actively managed, while GDX is passively managed. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. KGLD charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.51%/yr for GDX.
Performance
KGLD vs. GDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KGLD achieves a -5.13% return, which is significantly higher than GDX's -9.46% return.
KGLD
- 1D
- -1.68%
- 1M
- -9.30%
- YTD
- -5.13%
- 6M
- -9.58%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GDX
- 1D
- -4.64%
- 1M
- -8.66%
- YTD
- -9.46%
- 6M
- -13.97%
- 1Y
- 47.29%
- 3Y*
- 39.25%
- 5Y*
- 19.30%
- 10Y*
- 12.36%
KGLD vs. GDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
KGLD Kurv Gold Enhanced Income ETF | -5.13% | 29.75% |
GDX VanEck Gold Miners ETF | -9.46% | 62.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between KGLD and GDX is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2025 | 0.80 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KGLD vs. GDX — Risk / Return Rank
KGLD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GDX
KGLD vs. GDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv Gold Enhanced Income ETF (KGLD) and VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KGLD | GDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.20 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.31 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 3.44 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KGLD vs. GDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KGLD drawdown since its inception was -26.24%, smaller than the maximum GDX drawdown of -80.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KGLD and GDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KGLD | GDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.24% | -80.34% | +54.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -36.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -36.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -46.51% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -49.79% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.75% | -32.96% | +7.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.98% | -40.40% | +33.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 13.78% | — |
Volatility
KGLD vs. GDX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KGLD | GDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 17.61% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 40.05% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.01% | 47.64% | -18.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.01% | 36.89% | -7.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.01% | 37.37% | -8.36% |
KGLD vs. GDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
KGLD has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than GDX's 0.51% expense ratio.
Dividends
KGLD vs. GDX - Dividend Comparison
KGLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.72%, more than GDX's 0.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDX VanEck Gold Miners ETF | 0.82% | 0.74% | 1.19% | 1.61% | 1.66% | 1.67% | 0.53% | 0.67% | 0.50% | 0.76% | 0.26% | 0.85% |
KGLD Kurv Gold Enhanced Income ETF | 13.72% | 4.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KGLD and GDX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GDX is cheaper at 0.51% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GDX is cheaper with a 0.51% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for KGLD.
KGLD has the higher dividend yield at 13.72%, compared with 0.82% for GDX.
KGLD is categorized as Derivative Income, while GDX is Gold. They also come from different issuers: Kurv and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for KGLD and 0.51% for GDX.
Find the right allocation for KGLD and GDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer