KGGIX vs. GLEIX

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

KGGIX (Kopernik Global All-Cap Fund) and GLEIX (Goldman Sachs Energy Infrastructure Fund) are both mutual funds - KGGIX is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund managed by Kopernik, while GLEIX is a Energy Equities fund managed by Goldman Sachs. Over the past 5 years, KGGIX returned 10.16%/yr vs 23.23%/yr for GLEIX. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KGGIX charges 1.01%/yr vs 1.23%/yr for GLEIX.

Performance

KGGIX vs. GLEIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kopernik Global All-Cap Fund (KGGIX) and Goldman Sachs Energy Infrastructure Fund (GLEIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KGGIX achieves a 2.26% return, which is significantly lower than GLEIX's 23.92% return.

KGGIX

• 1D: -1.31%
• 1M: -6.65%
• YTD: 2.26%
• 6M: 1.48%
• 1Y: 26.33%
• 3Y*: 20.71%
• 5Y*: 10.16%
• 10Y*: 12.46%

GLEIX

• 1D: 1.45%
• 1M: -4.16%
• YTD: 23.92%
• 6M: 24.21%
• 1Y: 26.76%
• 3Y*: 33.51%
• 5Y*: 23.23%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KGGIX vs. GLEIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
KGGIX Kopernik Global All-Cap Fund	2.26%	64.88%	-4.91%	13.43%	-9.05%	16.86%	37.23%	10.00%	-11.07%	1.35%
GLEIX Goldman Sachs Energy Infrastructure Fund	23.92%	5.30%	58.18%	15.08%	18.96%	38.31%	-17.46%	16.95%	-15.17%	6.98%

Correlation

The correlation between KGGIX and GLEIX is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.04
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.23
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.41
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2017	0.45

Over the past year, the correlation between KGGIX and GLEIX has dropped to 0.04 - well below their long-term average of 0.45, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

KGGIX vs. GLEIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KGGIX

KGGIX Risk / Return Rank: 42
KGGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
KGGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
KGGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 42
KGGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
KGGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 36

GLEIX

GLEIX Risk / Return Rank: 57
GLEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
GLEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
GLEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 46
GLEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
GLEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KGGIX vs. GLEIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kopernik Global All-Cap Fund (KGGIX) and Goldman Sachs Energy Infrastructure Fund (GLEIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KGGIX	GLEIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.81	1.90	-0.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.36	2.61	-0.25
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.32	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.42	3.84	-1.42
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.41	9.03	-1.62

KGGIX vs. GLEIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KGGIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the GLEIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KGGIX and GLEIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

KGGIX vs. GLEIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KGGIX drawdown since its inception was -45.11%, smaller than the maximum GLEIX drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KGGIX and GLEIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	KGGIX	GLEIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.11%	-59.27%	+14.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.54%	-7.29%	-4.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.76%	-17.07%	+3.31%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.43%	-21.89%	-4.54%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.59%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.54%	-4.45%	-7.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.50%	-8.51%	-0.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.76%	3.09%	+0.67%

Volatility

KGGIX vs. GLEIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Kopernik Global All-Cap Fund (KGGIX) is 4.93%, while Goldman Sachs Energy Infrastructure Fund (GLEIX) has a volatility of 5.56%. This indicates that KGGIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLEIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KGGIX	GLEIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.93%	5.56%	-0.63%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.92%	11.33%	+1.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.45%	14.76%	+0.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.29%	20.58%	-5.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.99%	25.42%	-10.43%

KGGIX vs. GLEIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

KGGIX has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is lower than GLEIX's 1.23% expense ratio.

Dividends

KGGIX vs. GLEIX - Dividend Comparison

KGGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.10%, more than GLEIX's 8.07% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GLEIX Goldman Sachs Energy Infrastructure Fund	8.07%	10.00%	25.43%	10.22%	4.70%	8.41%	4.17%	4.83%	3.54%	0.68%	0.00%	0.00%
KGGIX Kopernik Global All-Cap Fund	16.10%	16.46%	1.04%	8.60%	13.59%	9.30%	4.81%	3.02%	0.25%	4.40%	3.34%	0.81%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KGGIX and GLEIX in my portfolio?

KGGIX and GLEIX have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KGGIX or GLEIX?

GLEIX has higher volatility (5.56%) compared to KGGIX (4.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KGGIX dropped -45.11% vs GLEIX's -59.27%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GLEIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.